Roger Federer shares what makes Nadal, Djokovic and him unique

tented

Administrator
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
21,611
Reactions
10,379
Points
113
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Roger Federer shares what makes Nadal, Djokovic and him unique

[The writing is far from great, and the translation is sloppy, but you’ll get the gist.]

Roger Federer shared what has made Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and him special over the years. The Big Three have combined to win 52 Grand Slam titles and they are not on the verge of retirement yet.

"I think it's the consistency, the quality we show in every single tournament. You look at all the individual characteristics of each player and the way we play, we are very different. That's what the people are very interested. There is a strong rivalry, there is also a good friendship, we get along well, without them I would not be able to play around today and I have enjoyed the rivalry we have had," said Federer.

On having a street named after him in Basel, Federer said: "It's great. I am lucky to have such friendly neighbors. When I was in the semifinals of Olympics they said that I was getting a street named after Roger Federer. It was a lovely gesture and I will always remember it."

Why does he keep playing tennis? "I love the game. I love everything about tennis, travel, even the press. Signing autographs, practicing is not something I really enjoyed doing in the past so I have always been very hungry for the success and I got to stay like that because otherwise, I am just hanging around and not really wanting to achieve anything anymore."

Federer commented on how he feels about being in the late stage of his career and possibly retiring from tennis in some time. Rod Laver said that the Swiss told him he wants to play until 40 years of age. "I try not to think about it, I try to push it away because I have the feeling the more time I think about how an exit would be, it's just like around the corner and that's why I have no idea how it's gonna work out, if it's going to be an injury or whatever. If you look in the history of the best players they have all retired totally different. Winning as many tournaments as I can, I do not play 30 tournaments like I used to be, I tell you there is no better feeling than leaving a week after having won a title," said Federer.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Federberg

atttomole

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
3,315
Reactions
1,101
Points
113
I hope he retires at 42, so that we can have 4 more years of magic.
 

El Dude

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
9,720
Reactions
5,066
Points
113
Pretty clear Fed is still playing because he just loves the sport. I don't think it's legacy protection he just loves it.

Wait, so you're saying the main reason he's playing is not so he can protect his lead over Novak and Rafa at any cost? You mean, he doesn't have the same paranoid mentality as DarthFed and Front242? :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
42,565
Reactions
13,766
Points
113
Pretty clear Fed is still playing because he just loves the sport. I don't think it's legacy protection he just loves it.
It's not JUST that he loves it, though, let's be real. Even he says: "There is a strong rivalry, there is also a good friendship, we get along well, without them I would not be able to play around today and I have enjoyed the rivalry we have had." He has made some obvious choices to get back the #1 in the last couple of years, which is clearly competitiveness with Rafa and Novak, and his own legacy. I don't fault that at all, to be clear. If it keeps him in the game, all to the good. In the doc "Strokes of Genius," Roger said that he didn't initially want a rival. But he has clearly embraced it, and is basically saying that it keeps him motivated.

As to his main point of the difference between them and the rest: consistency, I think it's well-made. It's a bit modest, because the really big difference is the talent gap, but it shouldn't be discounted. We've long discussed around here talented players who have underachieved due to their inability to build on big wins and to keep it going from tournament to tournament. That's not just talent, but mental strength, commitment, desire and a deeply competitive nature, IMO.