Fed said it was Rafa. YOu wouldn't want to go against what Fed said would you?
Pasted in from MTF, but the original is in Tennis Magazine:
Roger Federer news update: Swiss thinks he wasn't as talented as Rafael Nadal, Martina Hingis and Tiger Woods
Former world's no.1 Roger Federer thinks while he was oozing with potential in the early years of his tennis career he wasn't as prodigious as fellow tennis players Rafael Nadal, Martina Hingis and pro golfer Tiger Woods.
Tennis Magazine had an opportunity to interview Federer, who is currently training hard after suffering a knee injury a month ago.
According to the 34-year Swiss, he was already aware of enormous talent in him since the early phase of his pro career, though he wasn't able to convert it into positive results right away. Unlike Hingis and Nadal, who both easily breezed through the competition at an early age, Federer waited at least half a decade to win his first Grand Slam in 2003.
Google it and find the original.Does he say that or does the editor just title the article as such? Looks like click bait to me
Definitely the better athlete. Nice to see him so playing this well again.Grigor is the better athlete. He is in a top shape. Just need to focus and not DF so much
I believe you (but around here you need just a tiny spark to start a fire).
About Federer´s serve: Yes, his serve is more involved in his success than in the rest of the big 3 +1 case, basically because he serves better than them. The problem is not the argument in itself, it is what people jump to conclude right after it. "Oh, then he only wins due to his serve". Nadal has more physical strength than the rest of the big 3 +1, and physical strength is more involved in his success than in the other guys cases. But surely physical strength is not his main driver for success (I can think of handful of more important reasons, the first one is talent).
And -- little hair splitting here: Big server is different than good server. The big guys in general are good servers too, but still their serves are based on power (and height). Federer's serve is a reflection of his technical skills: It has power, but it has placement and variety, and it is extremely clutch on big moments. In other words, he serves well because he is an extremely good player, not the other way around.
So do I. He has a lovely game to watch. Don't really understand why it hasn't happened for him, I think the loss to Nadal AO had a bad effect on him.Come on Grigor! Step up and come into your own at last! Nothing against Kyrgios. His elevation to the top seems certain to me. I just want Grigor to become a factor
I don't think he loss to Nadal had a bad affect on him at all but he always seems not to be too stable. By the way he was practicing with Rafa in Mallorca between Wimbledon and Montreal and it seems that he has got more improvement than Rafa lolSo do I. He has a lovely game to watch. Don't really understand why it hasn't happened for him, I think the loss to Nadal AO had a bad effect on him.
I don't know how to say in his language but then I like to say in my own language, VAMOS DIMI!!!!!!!!
In Romanian is "Haide", so very close.Probably something like:
Aide Grišo!
My Bulgarian isn't too strong, but I am fairly certain in this one. We do have the same ancestors, after all.
Thanks PM!, then.... Aide Griso!!!!! (I can't find the little thing over the 's'Probably something like:
Aide Grišo!
My Bulgarian isn't too strong, but I am fairly certain in this one. We do have the same ancestors, after all.
)Sometimes I think Kyrgios is like a better version of Monfils. Great power and athleticism but with a bizarre mentality where he just plays mostly rally balls. I'm not saying he should crush the ball all the time, but he just loops everything in. I'll grant him that he hits a good length but it would be frightening if the guy upped his average rally speed. Not sure anyone would be able to live with him