brokenshoelace
Grand Slam Champion
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 9,380
- Reactions
- 1,334
- Points
- 113
an ace is an ace, a good passing shot is a good passing shot, a good approach is a good approach. What is the difference between an ace hit by Fed or ace hit by Nadal? they are aces, unreturnable serves, same thing. Is there a difference? What is the difference between a good approach shot into the corner, struck at 95mph if Roddick or fed hit it, tell me.
not only are you a moron, you are also suffering from trauma, and totally incoherent. What is it? Nadal loss in semis? or me and cali exposing you for who you are? keep your wits about you man, don't have these mental episodes, they are concerning.
Um, an ace is an ace, but Karlovic is faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar more likely to produce one than Nadal, the same way Federer is far more likely to produce a great forehand approach than Roddick, since he's got way more skills. Meaning that when he doesn't, it's uncharacteristic for him, hence the criticism. No seriously, it's illegal to be this fucking stupid. So we're not talking about a terrific approach shot that would have the same effect had it been hit by Federer or Roddick, we're talking about a BAD approach shot that Federer is far less likely to produce than Roddick. Get it?