GameSetAndMath said:Sam Querry lost promptly in the first round and now has more time to look for a bride. :snicker
JesuslookslikeBorg said:looksv like jj is heading for a 3rd set tb. yeeer.
1972Murat said:JesuslookslikeBorg said:looksv like jj is heading for a 3rd set tb. yeeer.
Maybe, but JJ will have to break the little guy. Diego to serve for it.
GameSetAndMath said:Carol35 said:Now Federer is critizing IW and Miami MS because are too close, then what about RG and Wimbledon which are GS and diferent surface and also are too close? any complain about it?
Did you even bother to read the article which had
Federer's opinions on this topic. His complaint was not that IW and M are too close. His complaint
is that about 5 days of his time (if he is successful at IW) and up to 14 days (if unsuccessful at IW)
are getting wasted as he (and of course other players) had to wait for M to begin after getting
eliminated at IW.
It is really a good decision to skip M for Fed. You skip only one ATP 1000 event, but you
get two weeks off. On the other hand, if he skips MC for example, he again misses only
one ATP 1000, but gets only one week off.
Even the winner of IW has to wait for 5 days to begin playing in M due to draw size
being 96 and the first round bye.
Carol35 said:GameSetAndMath said:Carol35 said:Now Federer is critizing IW and Miami MS because are too close, then what about RG and Wimbledon which are GS and diferent surface and also are too close? any complain about it?
Did you even bother to read the article which had
Federer's opinions on this topic. His complaint was not that IW and M are too close. His complaint
is that about 5 days of his time (if he is successful at IW) and up to 14 days (if unsuccessful at IW)
are getting wasted as he (and of course other players) had to wait for M to begin after getting
eliminated at IW.
It is really a good decision to skip M for Fed. You skip only one ATP 1000 event, but you
get two weeks off. On the other hand, if he skips MC for example, he again misses only
one ATP 1000, but gets only one week off.
Even the winner of IW has to wait for 5 days to begin playing in M due to draw size
being 96 and the first round bye.
Don't be so defensive, I have not criticed Rogers's critizing, I've said if ithere are also some complains about RG and Wimbledon which are scheduled in all the ways even worse than IW and Miami :-/
GameSetAndMath said:Carol35 said:GameSetAndMath said:Did you even bother to read the article which had
Federer's opinions on this topic. His complaint was not that IW and M are too close. His complaint
is that about 5 days of his time (if he is successful at IW) and up to 14 days (if unsuccessful at IW)
are getting wasted as he (and of course other players) had to wait for M to begin after getting
eliminated at IW.
It is really a good decision to skip M for Fed. You skip only one ATP 1000 event, but you
get two weeks off. On the other hand, if he skips MC for example, he again misses only
one ATP 1000, but gets only one week off.
Even the winner of IW has to wait for 5 days to begin playing in M due to draw size
being 96 and the first round bye.
Don't be so defensive, I have not criticed Rogers's critizing, I've said if ithere are also some complains about RG and Wimbledon which are scheduled in all the ways even worse than IW and Miami :-/
I am not being defnesive, i am just being offensive.Contrary to what you say, Roger is not critical about IW and M being close. Actually, he wants them even closer so that he does not waste time in between the two tourney if he chooses to play in both.