herios said:
Having all the shots in the book does not make a champion. I keep hearing this forever. One player does not need to have them all, but know to capitalize and use efficiently on what he has got in his arsenal.
Grigor has always had a submissive positioning on the court. That is simply bad strategy.
He is not a good enough counter puncher like Andy Murray is. And Murray also had the better results in his career when he stayed on the baseline and not 10 metres behind the baseline.
I could go on, but I will stop here. Folks just got simply carried away, that is all.
Herios, the reasons you gave above are good reasons why Dimitrov is not a champion, not that he will never become one. Bad positioning and bad strategy are easier to fix than lack of talent.
Most landscape changes in this century came without warning. The last big one (Djokovic) is obvious, even a small one like Wawrinka, or even yet surprise wins like Cilic.
I guess that no one is beting on Dimitrov any more, and that´s fair. But, apart from maybe one name or another, he is as good as anyone else in the top 50 for the next big thing. A bit ahead of some, on talent alone, for the reason I gave on the first paragraph.