agreed! Just got in. At first blush I like the look of Hikaru's bishops, that queen side rook of Sindarov's looks useless. Then I noticed the number of pawns! Hikaru is going to have to prove that his piece activity can compensate for the deficit, while it seems to me Sindarov just has to get pieces off the boardThis Naka-Sindarov game is already crazy. Tough to see this one ending in a draw especially since Naka badly needs to win. Needless to say if he loses today his tournament is over.
I can't help feeling that Hikaru made it easy for him. Go crazy against one of the out of form players, not the leader. Bad game strategy in my opinionWow, just read that Naka spent over 67 minutes on move 13 and still made a mistake with h4. I can’t really fault the aggressive approach since he was already down two points coming into today.
And for Sindarov, he paid homage to the Fischer philosophy of grabbing material whenever it’s available, and Naka never got much counterplay.
I just think he was desperate with being 2 points already. But you should see Naka’s comments in his stream after. He put the entire blame on his team for not having any preparation for Sindarov castling on move 12.I can't help feeling that Hikaru made it easy for him. Go crazy against one of the out of form players, not the leader. Bad game strategy in my opinion
ugh! That's not good. I've agree it's hard to cheat at the Candidates, and I would also include the World Cup. I haven't heard one top player even hint at suspicions about him. Not even Kramnik or Nepo, the two most likely individuals to raise concerns. Furthermore he plays what looks like clean chess and has a fairly consistent style. I would have a much harder time believing that of him than Hans. People will say what they want to say, but what happened between Magnus and Hans in St Louis is understandable. From what I heard Magnus had not only played him online before that, but he also played him casually outdoors. Knowing how Magnus got to understand Hikaru's style with those blitz games, I'm guessing that Magnus wanted to get a feel of his strength, and when Hans played him on the board at St Louis, the difference, in emotional behaviour and style made Magnus paranoid, given his known online cheating. Even if Hans didn't actually cheat, it's perfectly understandable that Magnus was suspicious. Hans made it worse by his inability to explain his thinking in post match interviews at that same tournament. With Sindarov I don't get the same feeling. He plays powerful chess in a relatively understandable way. So I hope to goodness it's not the caseI have a bad feeling there are going to be people that believe Sindarov is cheating and I’m reading old threads online and there seems to be rumors he has been banned in the past from Lichess and Chess.com. I feel like if those are legitimate rumors that is going to be brought up.
I believe it’s pretty damn difficult to cheat at a tournament like this, the only way it’s possible is a surgically implanted device IMO. And even that could potentially be detected.
There’s a lot to hate about Kramnik and unfortunately Nepo seems to be doing the same shit. But a big part of it is they won’t accuse a Soviet player. If Naka was sitting on 5.5 you’d have heard from them both by now.ugh! That's not good. I've agree it's hard to cheat at the Candidates, and I would also include the World Cup. I haven't heard one top player even hint at suspicions about him. Not even Kramnik or Nepo, the two most likely individuals to raise concerns. Furthermore he plays what looks like clean chess and has a fairly consistent style. I would have a much harder time believing that of him than Hans. People will say what they want to say, but what happened between Magnus and Hans in St Louis is understandable. From what I heard Magnus had not only played him online before that, but he also played him casually outdoors. Knowing how Magnus got to understand Hikaru's style with those blitz games, I'm guessing that Magnus wanted to get a feel of his strength, and when Hans played him on the board at St Louis, the difference, in emotional behaviour and style made Magnus paranoid, given his known online cheating. Even if Hans didn't actually cheat, it's perfectly understandable that Magnus was suspicious. Hans made it worse by his inability to explain his thinking in post match interviews at that same tournament. With Sindarov I don't get the same feeling. He plays powerful chess in a relatively understandable way. So I hope to goodness it's not the case
| Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Chess World Championship: Carlsen-Caruana | Other Sports | 262 | |
|
|
Top level chess | Other Sports | 46 | |
|
|
Chess World Championship | Other Sports | 150 |