Historical H2H: Who'd you take out of Larry Bird and Lebron James?
I think it's easily LeBron. Better stats, more longevity and accolades. I think if LeBron retired tomorrow most would have him anywhere from third to six on the all-time list. Clearly behind MJ and Kareem and somewhere with Magic, Wilt, and Russell.
There was a lot of chatter about it a couple of years ago after Reggie Miller said he'd take Bird. Most went with Bird to be honest, although clearly Lebron is the better athletically.
I haven't really followed NBA for a long time, I used to watch it as a kid in the 80s when Channel 4 in the UK used to put it on... in the heyday of Magic and Bird... I was always a big Lakers/Magic fan... I guess I followed closely up until the Pistons and then got back into it briefly when the Lakers re-emerged with Kobe and Shaq when they had big rivalry going with the Kings... so definitely not in the loop... but I'm intrigued on Bird's standing in the game (and Magic and Kareem's tbh) because when Bird was in his heyday... there was talk of him being the greatest (and Magic too) and yet twenty to thirty years later they have slipped behind players who retired before them... interesting how history re-evaluates things. I definitely put Bird in Magic's class. Interestingly, Jordan's legacy improves every year.
I'm a 90's kid and started watching during Jordan's first three peat. So I didn't see the 80's and before and much like tennis it can be hard to compare eras. But going off career achievements I think LeBron is already a top 5 player of all time. Chances are he ends up top 3 when all is said and done. I think it's going to be hard to pass up Kareem who often gets underrated on these lists. It isn't all about rings otherwise Russell is GOAT for getting 11 rings against a much smaller league. But regardless LeBron is incredible so who knows what can happen, he is going to be the best or one of the best in the league for many more years. He's already lost a lot of athleticism but it hasn't hurt him much.
On the other hand, if Kyrie leads the Celtics to the finals this year that is surely going to be tremendously damaging to Lebron's legacy
I don't see it like that. He's won two titles and made many finals without Kyrie. Uncle Drew is a great player but no one is ever going to say he's as good as LeBron.
It's not the comparison to Kyrie I'm thinking about. I agree with you there's no contest there. But it does highlight how Lebron has need cold blooded closers to get some of those wins. With MJ you knew he was the one putting the nail in the coffin. Lebron just fetches the nail for someone else to hammer. I still think the Cavs make it don't get me wrong, but it won't be a good look for Lebron
Historical H2H: Who'd you take out of Larry Bird and Lebron James?
I think you're referring to the game saving shot by Ray Allen in game 6 of the finals vs San Antonio and the game winner by Kyrie in game 7 vs Golden state. I think it's a little harsh when you consider LeBron scored something like 15 points in the 4th qtr to bring them back vs the Spurs and against Golden State he made one of the greatest defensive plays in NBA history to keep it a tied game in the last 2 minutes.
John Paxon hit the series ending shot vs Phoenix in 1993 and Jordan passed to Steve Kerr for a series ending shot in 1997. Those are just a couple great plays that shouldn't be held against Jordan.
Embarrassing in the last two minutes of that game? Last I checked he made a 3 and had something like 15 in the fourth quarter. I'd agree LeBron isn't the closer MJ was but who is? Kobe gets overrated in every way and isn't in MJ or LeBron's league by the way.
Also LeBron is by far a better passer than most of the guys he gets compared to often, he isn't afraid to give it to the open guy in crunch time. Fact of the matter is he is 3-5, obviously he is not MJ but of those losses he was only expected to win 1 or maybe 2 (Dallas and maybe San Antonio). They were slight favorites vs. the Thunder in 2012 and Spurs in 2013 and enormous underdogs vs the 73 win Warriors.
It took a harsh ruling (Draymond getting suspended) for them to beat the Warriors. Never mind Steph wasn't exactly in top physical condition. I"ve got no skin in the game here, but just wanted to point that out. I find it crazy that Steph gets slammed for his performance and so called Warriors choke when it took a confluence of events to help the Cavs to that win. Just saying
True, but on the other hand the Warriors weren't anywhere near as handicapped that year as the Cavs were the year before. The bottom line is James has actually played lights out in every finals except the first two and the only inexplicable one was against Dallas. The first one was as a 22 year old with Ilgauskas as his 2nd best player. Last year he averaged a triple double. The guy is a phenomenal player, probably top 5 all-time already but one thing he is guilty of...he is a horrible GM. A great coach, a greater player, and an atrocious general manager.
Embarrassing in the last two minutes of that game? Last I checked he made a 3 and had something like 15 in the fourth quarter.
I've always been conflicted about him. He's a phenomenal athlete, does great stuff off court. But he's a manipulative bitch. From what I'm hearing he tried to stop Kyrie leaving, while being the reason Kyrie wanted out, and I have no doubt he was the one who leaked that Kyrie wanted to leave in the first place. Would love it if the Celtics get to the finals this year
| Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
NBA (whenever)... | Other Sports | 137 | |
|
|
NBA 2023-24 Playoffs | Other Sports | 23 | |
|
|
2017 NBA Finals: Cleveland vs. Golden State Part Tres | Other Sports | 242 | |
|
|
2016-2017 NBA Playoffs | Other Sports | 229 | |
|
|
NBA 2016-2017 Season | Other Sports | 15 |