Borg-Vilas 86 shot rally

I.Haychew

Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
1,148
Reactions
176
Points
63
Let me know who wins the match as soon as it's over. :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie

shawnbm

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
3,465
Reactions
1,143
Points
113
It is a restricted clip so I can't see it. Who won the rally? That is basically one set worth of strokes in one rally! Hell, it could be more!
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
42,965
Reactions
14,135
Points
113
They played a lot of long rallies. Personally, I loved their matches. It made me a fan of clay. It's not boring...they are two great clay courters respecting each other, playing cat and mouse for an advantage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shawnbm

GameSetAndMath

The GOAT
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
21,141
Reactions
3,398
Points
113
Clearly, the pace of the game is very slow compared to modern tennis (even when restricted to modern clay matches).
 

shawnbm

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
3,465
Reactions
1,143
Points
113
True, but that had to do with the racquets and strings of that time; players were brought up to not hit at 100% each strike as the risk of it saikibgbout was too high. One modulated the stroke for maximum efficiency with power, but they could and did hit it hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: britbox

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
42,965
Reactions
14,135
Points
113
True, but that had to do with the racquets and strings of that time; players were brought up to not hit at 100% each strike as the risk of it saikibgbout was too high. One modulated the stroke for maximum efficiency with power, but they could and did hit it hard.
I think you're right that it was down to the equipment. I don't think the courts have changed in composition at RG or MC or Rome. (This match was at RG.) But with the old wooden racquets and gut strings, the players had to be even more patient against a dangerous opponent with great clay chops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shawnbm

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
27,372
Reactions
6,155
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
True, but that had to do with the racquets and strings of that time; players were brought up to not hit at 100% each strike as the risk of it saikibgbout was too high. One modulated the stroke for maximum efficiency with power, but they could and did hit it hard.

Exactly mate. If players in the modern game were taking cuts at the ball like they do now with that equipment than people would be ducking in Row Z of the grandstand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shawnbm

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
42,965
Reactions
14,135
Points
113
I figured that one was coming.