alright gang, thanks for not misbehaving. I'm turning off the chat. Please take all further comments to the match thread
Part of what we're seeing with the big gap between Sincaraz and the field, is that the "second tier" is in transition: Medvedev, Zverev, Tsitsipas, Rublev etc are fading, but there isn't a strong group to take the baton. Meaning, it is a bit of a valley...those guys are fading, but Draper, Fils, Musetti, Shelton, Rune, Mensik, etc, are still rising, or at least it is unclear what their peaks are.Some new guys will come along. Can't see any of the current crop challenging Sinner or Alcaraz, can any of you ?
For the sake of the sport, there better be some new faces that comes along.
Part of what we're seeing with the big gap between Sincaraz and the field, is that the "second tier" is in transition: Medvedev, Zverev, Tsitsipas, Rublev etc are fading, but there isn't a strong group to take the baton. Meaning, it is a bit of a valley...those guys are fading, but Draper, Fils, Musetti, Shelton, Mensik, etc, are still rising.
But it remains to be seen if any of those guys will be good enough to challenge. Of the ones I mentioned, Draper has been a bit disappointing this year as he hasn't done anything since winning Indian Wells. I think Musetti is really more of a 3rd tier (top 20) guy who is having a good run, but will never be a serious Slam contender. Shelton is a bit of a wildcard. Of these guys, he is one I could see having a great run and upsetting one of Sincaraz. Mensik (and Fonseca) have the talent, but are probably at least a year or two away from being serious threats to Sincaraz.
9 Frontiersmen voted for Alcaraz in 4. Apparently, that was the smart vote.
I think at one point I compared De Minaur to David Ferrer, if only in that both had/have a high floor and consistent level of good to very good play, but a low ceiling - neither ever wowed me (though I think Ferrer was better at his best, and probably would have won a Slam or two if born 5-10 years earlier). You could add in Casper Ruud as a similar type. For me, De Minaur can win a Masters or two, but I'd be very surprised if he wins a Slam. If you squint, you can imagine Ben Shelton continuing to evolve and going on an explosive run and winning a Slam. I just can't see that with De Minaur.Yes that's true. I thought and hoped by now De Minaur might develop more variety including power on his serve and groundies to challenge them but can't see that he'll ever be able to improve.
I wasn't able to see the chat. Do you have an idea why?alright gang, thanks for not misbehaving. I'm turning off the chat. Please take all further comments to the match thread
Ferrer is the greatest journeyman in tennis history.I think at one point I compared De Minaur to David Ferrer, if only in that both had/have a high floor and consistent level of good to very good play, but a low ceiling - neither ever wowed me (though I think Ferrer was better at his best, and probably would have won a Slam or two if born 5-10 years earlier). You could add in Casper Ruud as a similar type. For me, De Minaur can win a Masters or two, but I'd be very surprised if he wins a Slam. If you squint, you can imagine Ben Shelton continuing to evolve and going on an explosive run and winning a Slam. I just can't see that with De Minaur.
Carlos Alcaraz,
2nd youngest ever to win 6 GS titles after Borg
4th and youngest ever to win multiple slams in all surfaces ( only Wilander, Djokovic, Nadal did this)
He is 22 yo.
Sinner's serve let him down, for starters, but he wont give excuses, either will I, the better player won today that was Carlos, Jannik also said that.He's going to rule and control the sport for next 3-4 years.
Hey Margaret did Sinner look restricted to you ? In particular with movement around the court?



Sinner's serve let him down, for starters, but he wont give excuses, either will I, the better player won today that was Carlos, Jannik also said that.