The Movie Reel

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
45,357
Reactions
16,051
Points
113
This is an oldie, but a great one, if some of you have never seen it. Screened near me today, and I couldn't resist. One of my top favorite films of all time:


A seriously grown-up film about marriage. Many consider it Hepburn's greatest performance. Henri Mancini calls the theme his favorite piece he ever wrote.
 
Last edited:

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
28,295
Reactions
6,856
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
This is an oldie, but a great one, if some of you have never seen it. Screened near me today, and I couldn't resist. One of my top favorite films of all time:



A seriously grown-up film about marriage. Many consider it Hepburn's greatest performance. Henri Mancini calls the theme his favorite piece he ever wrote.

The video embed is not not showing up in Australia at least. What was the film?
 

Jelenafan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
4,035
Reactions
5,563
Points
113
Location
California, USA
This is an oldie, but a great one, if some of you have never seen it. Screened near me today, and I couldn't resist. One of my top favorite films of all time:



A seriously grown-up film about marriage. Many consider it Hepburn's greatest performance. Henri Mancini calls the theme his favorite piece he ever wrote.

The link is not working

I’m guessing it’s “Two for the Road” co-starring Albert Finney.

IIRC Contains one of my favorite lines when Audrey deals with a bratty child “ I wooed her”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
45,357
Reactions
16,051
Points
113
The link is not working

I’m guessing it’s “Two for the Road” co-starring Albert Finney.

IIRC Contains one of my favorite lines when Audrey deals with a bratty child “ I wooed her”.
Correct! Sorry, I should have checked the link, and should have said the title. Such a great script.
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
45,357
Reactions
16,051
Points
113
I saw two very good and interesting films this week.

"A House of Dynamite," Katherine Bigelow's new film. Really tense, and clocks in at a tidy 1 hour 50 something. I saw it at a screening, with a Q&A after with KB and her DP and editor, sound designer, composer and production designer. Learned some interesting things. Will tell you when others have seen it.

"One Battle After Another," the new Paul Thomas Anderson film. 2 hours 50 minutes, but they do fly by. I am a fan, but I thought it was great. I saw it in 70mm/VistaVision. It looks great, too. He had to have written it as a dystopian future, but now it feels ripped straight from the headlines. Di Caprio and Penn are terrific. And it is often very funny. PT Anderson can be divisive, so I'll be curious how it lands with others.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
18,166
Reactions
8,156
Points
113
I saw two very good and interesting films this week.

"A House of Dynamite," Katherine Bigelow's new film. Really tense, and clocks in at a tidy 1 hour 50 something. I saw it at a screening, with a Q&A after with KB and her DP and editor, sound designer, composer and production designer. Learned some interesting things. Will tell you when others have seen it.

"One Battle After Another," the new Paul Thomas Anderson film. 2 hours 50 minutes, but they do fly by. I am a fan, but I thought it was great. I saw it in 70mm/VistaVision. It looks great, too. He had to have written it as a dystopian future, but now it feels ripped straight from the headlines. Di Caprio and Penn are terrific. And it is often very funny. PT Anderson can be divisive, so I'll be curious how it lands with others.
Now, this part worries me a little, “it feels ripped straight from the headlines.” That kind of worries me in some way, because the reviews are favourable and I think he’s a great under-appreciated director, lauded though he is. But when Hollywood “rips straight from the headlines”, I think, that’s nothing new, and - of course - which headlines? CNN? MSNBC? Is this something Sean Penn and Mark Ruffalo might imagine in their wettest dreams? Then I see that Penn is in it, though it’s from the novel by Thomas Pynchon, and I’ve read some of his books and been bowled over. Mason & Dixon is in one of the most crazy, extraordinary novels ever written. But still, a tad foreboding now, unfortunately. When Hollywood goes political, it largely can be at its most mundane.

I think the Kathryn Bigelow film sounds interesting. She’s under-appreciated too - woefully so!
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
45,357
Reactions
16,051
Points
113
Now, this part worries me a little, “it feels ripped straight from the headlines.” That kind of worries me in some way, because the reviews are favourable and I think he’s a great under-appreciated director, lauded though he is. But when Hollywood “rips straight from the headlines”, I think, that’s nothing new, and - of course - which headlines? CNN? MSNBC? Is this something Sean Penn and Mark Ruffalo might imagine in their wettest dreams? Then I see that Penn is in it, though it’s from the novel by Thomas Pynchon, and I’ve read some of his books and been bowled over. Mason & Dixon is in one of the most crazy, extraordinary novels ever written. But still, a tad foreboding now, unfortunately. When Hollywood goes political, it largely can be at its most mundane.

I think the Kathryn Bigelow film sounds interesting. She’s under-appreciated too - woefully so!
Don't be worried! It's a good film. I just think he must have written a dystopian future, and then it has sort of come true. Holding pens of immigrants, right wing and left wing extremists. But it's also a farce, and it's funny. Just see it.

I honestly don't think either PT Anderson or Bigelow are that under-appreciated. (OK, I liked Licorice Pizza more than anyone I know.) Bigelow does have an Oscar for directing. Anyway, I'll be curious how you felt about both of the films.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
18,166
Reactions
8,156
Points
113
Don't be worried! It's a good film. I just think he must have written a dystopian future, and then it has sort of come true. Holding pens of immigrants, right wing and left wing extremists. But it's also a farce, and it's funny. Just see it.

I honestly don't think either PT Anderson or Bigelow are that under-appreciated. (OK, I liked Licorice Pizza more than anyone I know.) Bigelow does have an Oscar for directing. Anyway, I'll be curious how you felt about both of the films.
I love both these directors and you’re right, they’re appreciated but they aren’t on the tip of the tongue for your average cinema goer in the way Tarantino is, for instance, who I both like but think is overrated. I take your word for it that the film transcends political bias, I just tend to dislike films or songs that are political, generally because of the fatal weakness in the creators bias. Political extremism isn’t new so I doubt it has “sort of come true” since he wrote - but I’m glad you acknowledge that the far left are extreme and dystopian. :lulz1:

As for other film news, we watched Dog Day Afternoon at the weekend, the missus hasn’t seen it and I hadn’t watched it in 25 years, at least. I went off Pacino, with all his shouting and OTT acting, some time after Scent of a Woman.

DDA was still extraordinarily great, and this actually did seem to predict the future, with the stimulated mobs outside the bank in place of our modern rent-a-mob unthinking activists, the trans boyfriend, the whole thing was absurdly brilliant - and Pacino gave a performance that stands as tall as any. Great cast throughout.

By strange coincidence, a couple weeks before this I read an excerpt from his new autobiography where he mentions influences, Brando of course standing huge, but he says also, “John Cassavetes, who was his own kind of phenomenon.” I love John Cassavetes, so I ordered the book from the library.

There’s an American librarian who has annoyed me a couple of times. Libraries today aren’t the hush places they used to be. They’re quiet but you don’t hear any librarians saying shush. One day I was checking my phone to look up a book - which I commonly do, as do others - and the American librarian went out of her way to yell over to me, no phones in the library. I told her what I was doing and she repeated “no phones” and I continued on the phone until I found what I wanted.

Another time I was collecting a book I’d ordered and she was going through my account and she saw I had a book that was overdue, already 4 times renewed. We can renew them five times, then we have to return them. We’re have no fines any more, a change in rules that resulted in thousands of library books being returned soon at it became the law.

She was labouring and humming about her difficulty giving me the book I’d ordered and she said about the overdue book, that we can only renew books 4 times and that the system wouldn’t let her let me take out the book I’d ordered. As I say, we can actually renew books five times so I was fiddling with my phone - again - ready to renew the book myself in front of her when she declared with much strain that she’d worked a miracle and could give me the ordered book, but she couldn’t resist adding, trying to be comical, “bring back that book!”

Last week I returned Dog Day and she saw i was taking out The Innocent by Visconti and she declared herself a cinephile and she praised Pacino’s performance and she says she sometimes has a group meeting of movie lovers and she’d seen the Visconti and had I seen this that and the other, and we were at peace! We didn’t even need Trump, we have movies.

By the way, the Pacino book is a fast read, very interesting, more so at the beginning, I’d say of the 370 pages, the last 100 covers maybe the last 40 years. There’s no index, which is a trial, but it’s well worth a read..
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Moxie

don_fabio

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
May 2, 2019
Messages
4,815
Reactions
5,318
Points
113
Well yeah, I went to go see F1 the Formula One (DUH!!) racing flick with Brad Pitt. The director of Top Gun/Maverick also did this one and of course you can see the similarities. BTW racing great Lewis Hamilton is one of the producers and makes a cameo, (and of course that bitch Verstappen won't go anywhere near this film, sorry F1 gossip) It fits neatly into the American concept of a film hero, ie the lone wolf, rugged individualist that flaunts the rules, the hero traumatized by an earlier incident, etc, cliches and all but I really enjoyed it.

They are racing around an oval track (but I'm a sucker for formula one racing) but it's done imaginatively, think of car choreography, and even the pit stops are as cinematic and crucial to the plot lines as you can make them, LOL. Brad has good chemistry with the other actors such as the young hot shot #1 driver, (Damson Idrisr) the crewpit director, the beleaguered team owner (Javier Bardem), the oily Board of Director (can anyone else do oily like Tobias Menzies?) the car designer (Kelly Condon). The arenaline rush from those incredible machines racing down the track, the question of which tires to use, the design of those racing, cars, it was all catnip to me.

Brad Pitt is aging into a slightly weathered looking older Brad PItt and it suits him, at least in this role. I dunno, he has an easy unforced charm you can't manufacture, I guess that why some people are movie stars. -
Watched it last night and enjoyed the movie. Lots of similarities with Top Gun with regards to production and the F1 racing scenes looked top notch. As a kid I watched F1 almost every race, it was M. Schumacher and Hakinnen era at the time, but later as I grew up I kind of gave up on watching F1 and lost the interest. They changed so many rules over the years. I did watch that controversial last race of the season a few years back, when Hamilton lost to Verstappen. Anyway, tennis still remains my no.1 sport to watch and play.

I think I made a mistake for not going to see this movie when it was released in teathers. It was aired in the open cinema in the summer place I spend time, if I am in the country. I remember sippin' white wine literally 20 meters from the cinema while hearing racing noises.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kieran

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
18,166
Reactions
8,156
Points
113
Watched it last night and enjoyed the movie. Lots of similarities with Top Gun with regards to production and the F1 racing scenes looked top notch. As a kid I watched F1 almost every race, it was M. Schumacher and Hakinnen era at the time, but later as I grew up I kind of gave up on watching F1 and lost the interest. They changed so many rules over the years. I did watch that controversial last race of the season a few years back, when Hamilton lost to Verstappen. Anyway, tennis still remains my no.1 sport to watch and play.

I think I made a mistake for not going to see this movie when it was released in teathers. It was aired in the open cinema in the summer place I spend time, if I am in the country. I remember sippin' white wine literally 20 meters from the cinema while hearing racing noises.
I was like that with the same directors film, Top Gun Maverick. If I had a Time Machine I’d go back and see it in the cinema…
 
  • Like
Reactions: don_fabio

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
18,166
Reactions
8,156
Points
113
I watched Blue Jasmine by Woody Allen last night, one of his serious films. He has a few and if the rest are as great as this, I’ll eat them all. I have Another Woman ordered from the library, great cast with Gene Hackman and Gena Rowlands.

Blue Jasmine has a tour de force performance by Cate Blanchett. Bit of a tour de force by Woody, too, as the writer as well as director. After a while I thought, there’s a lot in this film, it was so good - and yet only one hour had passed. The sign of his brilliance, he could tell more about a character in one scene than many ordered would tell in ten scenes.

It made me nostalgic for classic movies where writers could show a persons character with great subtlety, and not necessarily drag it out. Allen was a master of this subtlety. Blue Jasmine in total weighed in at a healthy 90 minutes.

Remember when a 3 hour film used to be an “epic”, but now it’s just a long film, without anything epic about it? There’s a lot we lost in that transition.

Speaking of long movies, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is 2’41”. Not disastrously long but watching it again - I love this film - brought home to me the different between the two great writer/directors of American cinema. Aesthetically, they reach for different things. Tarantino is famously described as making movies about movies. He makes beautiful movies, his detail and evident love of his characters, the excessively cartoonish violence notwithstanding, but there’s no tension in Tarantino flicks. They’re entertaining, but not real, or reflective of anything real. There’s nothing to lose, nothing at stake, no moral dilemma. They’re extravagant poses.

I love Once Upon a Time in Hollywood for all that, but Blue Jasmine affected me very differently…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
45,357
Reactions
16,051
Points
113
Favorite Christmas films? I think we've done this before. I did just watch Die Hard, to kick off the mood. LOL. I know it's not traditional, and I'll watch sweeter ones, but that's a classic Christmas action film, and it informed a lot of action films after it. Scrooged is another favorite, and I will get to "It's a Wonderful Life," eventually. Also, "Elf," which surprised me, and "Love, Actually," which I warmed up to, because my mother loved it, and we watched it together every year, just the two of us, before the family came up, while we made pies.