Wimbledon Final: Murray v Raonic

[britbox]

Yes, he probably would have won this anyway... but it's not just a coincidence, clearly Lendl does have a huge positive impact.

 

[Ricardo]

Andy is born a sook, he needs a strong figure to lead him

 

[britbox]

Milos won 41/68 at the net...

 

[Billie]

LOL we'll see what happens from now on

 

[Billie]

too many poor approaches against an excellent passer

 

[Ricardo]

its no coincidence, these champion players are all proven... starting with Becker, Edberg, Chang, and Lendl of course

 

[Ricardo]

none of them does much to change players game, but they seem to handle situation better.....Billy should know that

 

[britbox]

Definitely... those guys all had a positive impact.

 

[Billie]

LOL first major with Nole and Becker, Nole lost in the quarters of AO

 

[Ricardo]

still you can't say Andy would've won anyway (without Lendl) because it's not a fact

 

[Ricardo]

Because Nole got outplayed, nothing to complain about that

 

[britbox]

Not a fact, but it's the first time he's played anyone other than Federer or Djokovic in a slam final.

 

[Billie]

seeing he is not playing the only guy he has lost in majors this year across the net today, I am confident he would have won anyway

 

[Billie]

and there is that BB

 

[Ricardo]

then again, he only ever beat Nole and Fed in slam/olympic final when Ivan was around

 

[Billie]

watch tennis Ricardo LOL don't argue with me, you won't win

 

[Federberg]

totally agree. I'm sure the press will talk about the Lendl effect, but there is simply no causality here

 

[Ricardo]

argue with you? nah, you are a Nole fan, i take you apart

 

[britbox]

Bottom line is that Lendl is definitely a positive in the camp, but Murray wins the matches.

 

[britbox]

Raonic serving to stay in.