Slam results - consistency and era

[El Dude]

I see... but for the percentages, do you include non-played slams on it?

No. The percentages are QF or better results divided by number of Slams played in.

 

[mrzz]

I see... but for the percentages, do you include non-played slams on it?

No. The percentages are QF or better results divided by number of Slams played in.

Thanks El Dude. By the way, remember that thread of yours "Federer is setting the standard right now"? The argument there still holds, I would guess. You could bring it back to the top with a post like "I told you, I told you..."

 

[El Dude]

Thanks El Dude. By the way, remember that thread of yours "Federer is setting the standard right now"? The argument there still holds, I would guess. You could bring it back to the top with a post like "I told you, I told you..."

Ha ha, not really my style but thanks for the props. But yeah, I just remembered that thread the other day. I think the premise held then and holds now. Again, it wasn't that I was saying Federer was the best player in the game--I think he's clearly the third best right now, and has been since before Novak's peak started in 2011--but that he represents the bar that a player must rise beyond to win. He's the gatekeeper to the title, in a way.