2026 Predictions (Bold or Bland)

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,110
Reactions
7,184
Points
113
Put your predictions here. No specific format, but some ideas to consider:

Year-end #1, top 5, top 10
Slam Winners
New Masters Winners
Risers/Breakouts
Fallers/Decline
Retirements
Bold Predictions (that you don't really think will happen, but could)
etc, etc

I'll post mine in the comments feel free to add stuff later, as you think of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,110
Reactions
7,184
Points
113
To get things started.

RANKINGS
My overall prediction is that the rankings is going to be really dense and heated in the 5-15ish range, even 3-20ish. There are a lot of guys with a shot at the top 10, and until someone else emerges, anything outside of the top 2 can really shift around. I've tried to make a predicted rankings list, but given up. There are just too many questions, and too many players who have a shot of sneaking into the top 10.

As for #1, I'd give Sinner the edge due to his greater consistency. But it is hard imagining them not being 1-2 again. After that, all bets are off.

SLAM WINNERS
At this point it is hard to see the Sincaraz hegemony breaking up. Really it comes down to if someone is going to "pirate" a Slam title, who will it be and when?

Long-term I stand by Fonseca being the top candidate to legitimately challenge the two, but we're still probably a couple years away from that. Right now, my top three darkhorses are Novak, Draper, and Shelton. For Novak to do it, he has to have the fitness. It is hard for a 38-39 year old to complete with 22-4 year olds, no matter how great the old guy once was (and still is); those two young guys are also really great. I honestly just don't think Novak can beat Sinner anymore; Carlos, yes - or at least as recently as a year ago.

If Sincaraz take all four, I still think 2-2 is most likely, but the margins between them are so slim that it could quite easily go 3-1 either way. 3-1 for Alcaraz if he is able to muster his superhero form more often and/or Sinner comes up lame; 3-1 for Sinner if Alcaraz's form falters, perhaps due to post-Ferrero hangover. I think it is about even on 3-1; Alcaraz might still have the better absolute peak form, but Sinner isn't far behind, and still is the more consistent player - both in terms of floor performance but also his ability to find his best form.

NEW MASTERS WINNERS
The top three candidates, in my mind, are (in no particular order): Auger-Aliassime, Musetti, and De Minaur.

Darkhorses are Fonseca, Fils, Bublik, and Paul. Fonseca and Fils will get there, though not sure in 2026. Really dark horses are Lehecka, Cerundolo, Cobolli, Darderi, Tien.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
18,166
Reactions
8,156
Points
113
Good stuff brother, and such an exact summary, it’s hard to add much to it, except that I think that the Missing Link generation, which has only Medvedev and the absent Thiem slams to show for almost a decade of effort, is most likely in permanent decline. The Greek’s Trojan Horse has no invading army concealed inside, and Zverev is like a 100m runner who hasn’t the legs or heart for the important dash. Medvedev might surge angrily and pull off a result but he’s been like a sulking child for too long for him to turn it around.

Hard to see past the Big 2 again, and you broke that down too. The Ferrero situation is the most bizarre I’ve seen from a great player and their coach. Alcaraz seems to have shoved JCF under a bus, for some reason, unless I’m reading it wrong. I don’t mind the ruthlessness but he can be ruthless and still respectful. We don’t know the full story, I suppose. I certainly don’t. The only similar thing I can think of was when Roger won his first Wimbledon and immediately dropped Peter Lundgren. But that’s not even comparable to this. So you’re right, it might have a resonance, but I hope it doesn’t. I hope Carlos isn’t the type to sabotage his obvious trajectory to all-time greatness, comparable to the 3, but we’ll see.

My hope is that he wins Australia and becomes the youngest career slam winner of the open era. And that his great promise is fulfilled properly in 2026.

I think Sinner is the obvious Other, and he’s also great - and more reliable than Carlos. Their rivalry is real. Unusual too, with two matches at each of Paris, London and New York, but I’d have expected Sinner to win in Paris (he’s been beaten twice) and Carlos to win the Wimbledon matches, and he’s lost both. This will change, I’m sure, but Sinner is the one who always turns up, while Carlos is a lot younger (in tennis years) and should be ready this year for greater consistency.

Others will win big titles when these two slip or aren’t at full pelt, but they’re miles behind them. Miles!

I’ll watch out for Fonseca, it’ll be great if a young player with big balls rose up and upset the formalities..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie and El Dude

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,110
Reactions
7,184
Points
113
Always a pleasure to read your Hibernian haikus, Kieran.

I don't think Fonzie will upset things quite yet, but he's on the radar. As I said, I mainly hope to see him go deeper in tournaments as he acclimates to the grind and, if I'm greedy, maybe snag a Masters by year's end.

Yeah, the Carlos-Juan-Carlos affair is strange. I can't remember if it was Gill Gross or Andy Roddick (I think Gross), but he was speculating that maybe because Ferrero has been his coach since he was 15, and exerts a good amount of competitive pressure on Alcaraz, maybe Carlos feels like he's ready to stand on his own and balance tennis and life outside of tennis. To paraphrase, I think (Gross) said something like "You can party in Ibiza, but only if you do X-Y-Z." Maybe Carlos doesn't want "dad" bugging him anymore about his work-life balance.

When you're 22, and especially when you've won 6 Slams at 22, maybe you feel like you want to change things up and not have "dad" pecking at you. Maybe you feel like you can do it on your own, or with a coach who is a bit more chill and hands-off. I mean, let's be frank: you or I could probably coach Carlos and he'd still be great. Maybe not as great as with Ferrero or a real coach, but he's so talented that he'd be just fine.

But the real question is whether he's the type of player that needs that kind of outside voice to succeed at his best level. As far as I understand, Samuel Lopez isn't that - he's a bit more chill. I'd say there's a non-zero chance that he stumbles a bit out of the gate, but there's also a chance that he thrives without Ferrero's presence. Most likely, he's essentially the same, but it bears watching.

I don't think it will happen, but I'd love to see Roger coach him. What a combo that would be. Again, I don't think Roger wants to be a coach, but you never know. Rafa would be fun too, but if Ferrero was intense, I can only imagine how Rafa would be (one player said that he coaches just as intensely as he played).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie and Kieran

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
18,166
Reactions
8,156
Points
113
Always a pleasure to read your Hibernian haikus, Kieran.

I don't think Fonzie will upset things quite yet, but he's on the radar. As I said, I mainly hope to see him go deeper in tournaments as he acclimates to the grind and, if I'm greedy, maybe snag a Masters by year's end.

Yeah, the Carlos-Juan-Carlos affair is strange. I can't remember if it was Gill Gross or Andy Roddick (I think Gross), but he was speculating that maybe because Ferrero has been his coach since he was 15, and exerts a good amount of competitive pressure on Alcaraz, maybe Carlos feels like he's ready to stand on his own and balance tennis and life outside of tennis. To paraphrase, I think (Gross) said something like "You can party in Ibiza, but only if you do X-Y-Z." Maybe Carlos doesn't want "dad" bugging him anymore about his work-life balance.

When you're 22, and especially when you've won 6 Slams at 22, maybe you feel like you want to change things up and not have "dad" pecking at you. Maybe you feel like you can do it on your own, or with a coach who is a bit more chill and hands-off. I mean, let's be frank: you or I could probably coach Carlos and he'd still be great. Maybe not as great as with Ferrero or a real coach, but he's so talented that he'd be just fine.

But the real question is whether he's the type of player that needs that kind of outside voice to succeed at his best level. As far as I understand, Samuel Lopez isn't that - he's a bit more chill. I'd say there's a non-zero chance that he stumbles a bit out of the gate, but there's also a chance that he thrives without Ferrero's presence. Most likely, he's essentially the same, but it bears watching.

I don't think it will happen, but I'd love to see Roger coach him. What a combo that would be. Again, I don't think Roger wants to be a coach, but you never know. Rafa would be fun too, but if Ferrero was intense, I can only imagine how Rafa would be (one player said that he coaches just as intensely as he played).
Hey brother, thanks for the kind words, they rebound straight back at you, and I hope you're gonna have a great 2026! :clap:

Interesting on Carlos v Juan Carlos. If true, it can be dangerous for a 22 year old to think he doesn't need an adult in the car, slamming on the breaks when the red light appears. It definitely ought to incentivise Carlos for Oz, to avoid headlines and pressure that tells him, WTF Chaz, you had a great thing going!

Roger would be a great coach for Carlos, he's probably the only ex-pro who can imagine what Carlos deals with on court, with an endless array of shot choices and a limited time to choose. Roger was similar so they'd have a huge amount of common ground, off the bat. Rafa would be too intensely anal for any young player, and that's even before he starts coaching, but just walking on court adjusting his shorts...
 
  • Like
Reactions: El Dude

mrzz

Hater
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
6,768
Reactions
3,793
Points
113
I agree that Fonseca is hardly going to win something big just yet, but he may well be a giant killer and clear the path for others... He will end the year with more than a few top ten scalps.
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
45,357
Reactions
16,051
Points
113
Hey brother, thanks for the kind words, they rebound straight back at you, and I hope you're gonna have a great 2026! :clap:

Interesting on Carlos v Juan Carlos. If true, it can be dangerous for a 22 year old to think he doesn't need an adult in the car, slamming on the breaks when the red light appears. It definitely ought to incentivise Carlos for Oz, to avoid headlines and pressure that tells him, WTF Chaz, you had a great thing going!

Roger would be a great coach for Carlos, he's probably the only ex-pro who can imagine what Carlos deals with on court, with an endless array of shot choices and a limited time to choose. Roger was similar so they'd have a huge amount of common ground, off the bat. Rafa would be too intensely anal for any young player, and that's even before he starts coaching, but just walking on court adjusting his shorts...
Adding on to what you and El Dude said, I was also thinking that perhaps Juan Carlos was a bit too much of a 2nd father for him, which he was, and it served him very well, but maybe feels he doesn't need that, anymore. I don't know if it was a money dispute. I hope it wasn't. That would be puny.

It will be interesting to see if he misses the constancy and sturdiness of JCF, and has trouble on his own. He can be a bit wayward.

While I don't think Federer is interested in a coaching job, I agree he's an interesting idea for Alcaraz, since they both had the "problem" of so many shots to choose from. Rafa is not the right fit, for now, anyway, precisely because he IS so intense. And, his model for coaching is Uncle Toni, who was like a father figure and very demanding. If anything, it does seem like that's what Alcaraz is looking to get away from. Roger has a chill aspect.

I'll try to work up some predictions, which I'm terrible at, so probably with the benefit of some New Year's champagne.

HAPPY 2026, ALL!! :partying-face::party-popper:
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,110
Reactions
7,184
Points
113
No worries, Moxie. I think we're all terrible at it..except for the obvious ones ("Sincaraz will win stuff next year"). Enjoy your bubby.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Moxie

PhiEaglesfan712

Major Winner
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,543
Reactions
1,348
Points
113
I hope Carlos isn’t the type to sabotage his obvious trajectory to all-time greatness, comparable to the 3, but we’ll see.
Mats Wilander was 24 when he suddenly stopped winning. So, there is precedent to this.

On the women's tour, it's more obvious. Jennifer Capriati and Martina Hingis come to mind.
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
45,357
Reactions
16,051
Points
113
Mats Wilander was 24 when he suddenly stopped winning. So, there is precedent to this.

On the women's tour, it's more obvious. Jennifer Capriati and Martina Hingis come to mind.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
18,166
Reactions
8,156
Points
113
Mats Wilander was 24 when he suddenly stopped winning. So, there is precedent to this.

On the women's tour, it's more obvious. Jennifer Capriati and Martina Hingis come to mind.
I would say John McEnroe is better example than Mats, simply because Mats game was attritional and wearying (on him and everyone) but John was the first of the Three Great Magicians of the Open Era, the other two being Roger and Carlos. These players did and do impossible, unthought of, things to a tennis ball. McEnroe has always been the most gifted - to me - simply because he was utterly unorthodox and ingenious, whereas Roger and Carlos are more orthodox technically, irregardless of their obvious magic.

But Mats wasn't only burnt out, and lacking motivation, but I think his dad was ill with cancer, in 1989, which affected him terribly, and I think his motivation was affected after his stellar season in '88.

But John went through an identity crisis, in face of the giant power game. Does he try his feather-lite touch against a barrage of cannonballs? Would it work? What about a huge racket instead? Give up sex before the warmup? Bulk up his ass? Chanting at the change of ends?

Or stay the same? I dunno... :help:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,110
Reactions
7,184
Points
113
Don't all early declines have stories, though?

For Mac, it was a combination of Tatum O'Neal, social life (and drama), and perhaps a loss of drive after 1984, which was one of the very best tennis seasons of the Open Era (I have it as a clear #4). I think also the game was changing and, well, he wasn't. His last prime year was 1985 when he still won three Masters and finished #2, but then he started missing long spells and the game sort of passed him by.

For Mats, I believe it was mostly a lack of motivation and other related factors - his father dying, and also missing a flight that crashed might have shifted his perspective a bit. He "soft retired" in 1991 to focus on music and family, and then came back in 1993, seemingly because he missed playing, but was a shadow of his former self.

And of course there's Borg, but we didn't really get to see a true decline, though the baton of best player in the world was wrestled from him by Mac in 1981 and while I suspect that even if he hadn't lost motivation, he wouldn't have quite been the player he was in 78-80. Mac was the new king, Lendl was rising, and Wilander right behind - plus you had Edberg and Becker emerging a couple years later. I really don't think Borg would have won more than one or two more Slams, even if--in an alternate reality--he had taken a short break and showed up re-inspired in Monte Carlo in '82.

We could also mention Lleyton Hewitt. I think his early decline was due to injuries and Roger Federer. A lot of Roger's peers mysteriously "declined" in the 2004-06 period. I mean, Andy Roddick didn't as much decline as never could get past Roger. Same with Hewitt, who was essentially the same player in 2003-05 as he had been at #1 in 2001-02, with the big drop in level occurring in 2006. But both of these guys probably would have won 2-3 more Slams, if not for Roger.

As for Carlos, putting aside possible injury, I think he'll remain on top for as long as he wants to (within reason). Early bloomers sometimes decline early due to burnout and/or wear-and-tear on the body. I wouldn't be surprised if we only have 3-4 more years of peak Carlos, and then he starts wobbling sometime in the second half of his 20s. But a lot of folks also thought Rafa was winding down in 2012, then 2015-16, and he always managed to fight his way back. Carlos isn't the same guy as Rafa, though, and I do wonder how much he'll care, say, five years form now when he's got a dozen or more Slam trophies and the young guys keep coming in waves.

I think Mac is an interesting comp for him, because like Mac, he plays on his unparalleled talent. The workman Lendl eventually surpassed Mac in '85, and we might see something similar from Sinner, who has a Lendl-esque quality to him and is less likely to lose focus and drive than Carlos is. But who knows. I wouldn't be surprised to see Carlos lose something in the next few years, but he could also keep the fire going much longer. It will be interesting to see how the potential rise of Fonseca impacts him, but that's probably at least two years away from him being on a similar level as Sincaraz - if that ever happens.
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,110
Reactions
7,184
Points
113
My dear Moxie and Kieran,
I have to disagree with you both, regarding Rafa being 'too intense' to coach Alacaraz.
Yes Rafa is intense, but he would bring a lot of wisdom, tactical advice, strong values, also his focus always being one of his strong points. Rafa at this point in time has no intentions of coaching, personally down the track I could see him as DC Captain for Spain. I feel Alcaraz still needs a more 'structured coach' JCF was strict and probably old school in many ways, Alcaraz really 'evolved' under his guidance from a teenager to a young man and a outstanding player.
Further reading into the split, no it wasnt a money matter with the new contract, there were new inclusions that JCF could not comply with, though he never stated them.I think we will never know quite frankly.
At present Samuel Lopez will be Alcaraz coach until they find a replacement for JCF.
To be fair to Moxie and Kieran, I was the one who first dropped that doozy - and I was basing it on Gross and/or Roddick's comments.

I think Rafa would be great for him if that is the kind of coaching Carlos wants, and I don't think it is -- otherwise he'd stick with Ferrero. The only way he'd bring in someone like Rafa (if Rafa was willing) is if he tried his way and it failed substantially. Meaning, if he had a 2026 in which Sinner had the clear edge. I don't think that will happen, at least not enough to really make Carlos rethink letting Ferrero go. But he's going to want to try his way first before bring in another Rafa/Ferrero type.

The concern I have for Carlos, or at least a hypothetical nightmare scenario, is that without Ferrero or a coach pushing him hard, he loses a bit of that edge and struggles to maintain his focus, but gets by enough on his natural ability to still bring in several Slams over the next couple years. Now let's say its the end of 2027 and Carlos looks back and sees that while he's still in the Big Two, he's now the clear #2, and he starts having second thoughts about letting Ferrero go. So he rehires Ferrero or someone like him. Now its 2028 and he's 25...still young enough to be in prime form, but now Fonseca is in his prime and several other young guys are pushing at the elite.

It is a brutal sport - you can blink once, but not twice. You have to keep evolving, keep working. And you need that competitive fire to keep burning. Part of Carlos's charm is a quality that he plays in an almost child-like way - like its fun and while I do think he wants to win, I don't know if it burns him up if he doesn't. I am completely making this up, but I could see many conversations between him and JCF going something like:

JCF: If you want to keep pace with Sinner, you need to hold off on that Ibiza trip and do X, Y, Z.
CAG: JCF, Chill. Things are great - I just beat Jannik at the USO. I've got this, bro.
JCF: But you need to work on X, Y, Z - you have to keep pushing, keep working.
CAG: OK, but let me go for a quick dip - and then I've got some ladies to see. Tomorrow, ok?
JCF: (Throws hands up and walks away)

Alright, that might be a bit much...but I think there might be some element of that.

That said, he is just 22. Maybe as he matures mentally he'll hone his focus and drive. Maybe the rivalry with Sinner will help him keep that edge, like it did for the Big Three. I really don't know. I just think he's more of a wildcard, in terms of where his career might go over the next five years, than Jannik is. In five years, Jannik might have lost a step physically, but I think he'll still be focused and will have adapted his game as much as possible. I think the same could be true with Carlos, just that there's a wider range of outcomes - and a greater chance of him losing focus/drive.
 

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
52,802
Reactions
33,591
Points
113
To be fair to Moxie and Kieran, I was the one who first dropped that doozy - and I was basing it on Gross and/or Roddick's comments.

I think Rafa would be great for him if that is the kind of coaching Carlos wants, and I don't think it is -- otherwise he'd stick with Ferrero. The only way he'd bring in someone like Rafa (if Rafa was willing) is if he tried his way and it failed substantially. Meaning, if he had a 2026 in which Sinner had the clear edge. I don't think that will happen, at least not enough to really make Carlos rethink letting Ferrero go. But he's going to want to try his way first before bring in another Rafa/Ferrero type.

The concern I have for Carlos, or at least a hypothetical nightmare scenario, is that without Ferrero or a coach pushing him hard, he loses a bit of that edge and struggles to maintain his focus, but gets by enough on his natural ability to still bring in several Slams over the next couple years. Now let's say its the end of 2027 and Carlos looks back and sees that while he's still in the Big Two, he's now the clear #2, and he starts having second thoughts about letting Ferrero go. So he rehires Ferrero or someone like him. Now its 2028 and he's 25...still young enough to be in prime form, but now Fonseca is in his prime and several other young guys are pushing at the elite.

It is a brutal sport - you can blink once, but not twice. You have to keep evolving, keep working. And you need that competitive fire to keep burning. Part of Carlos's charm is a quality that he plays in an almost child-like way - like its fun and while I do think he wants to win, I don't know if it burns him up if he doesn't. I am completely making this up, but I could see many conversations between him and JCF going something like:

JCF: If you want to keep pace with Sinner, you need to hold off on that Ibiza trip and do X, Y, Z.
CAG: JCF, Chill. Things are great - I just beat Jannik at the USO. I've got this, bro.
JCF: But you need to work on X, Y, Z - you have to keep pushing, keep working.
CAG: OK, but let me go for a quick dip - and then I've got some ladies to see. Tomorrow, ok?
JCF: (Throws hands up and walks away)

Alright, that might be a bit much...but I think there might be some element of that.

That said, he is just 22. Maybe as he matures mentally he'll hone his focus and drive. Maybe the rivalry with Sinner will help him keep that edge, like it did for the Big Three. I really don't know. I just think he's more of a wildcard, in terms of where his career might go over the next five years, than Jannik is. In five years, Jannik might have lost a step physically, but I think he'll still be focused and will have adapted his game as much as possible. I think the same could be true with Carlos, just that there's a wider range of outcomes - and a greater chance of him losing focus/drive.
My post disappeared? for some reason
The reason I addressed Moxie and Kieran we are all Rafa fans:)
I also listened to both Roddick and Gil Gross opinions.and others on the subject.
I also have concerns that Carlos Father dosent interfere, with his sons ongoing career, apparently there has been tension between JCF and Carlos father over the past 2 years.
Personally I still feel at this stage of his career he still needs a more structured coach, Lopez on the other hand is more relaxed which balances the coaching arrangement.
Time will tell, Andy Murray's name was mentioned, I cant see that happening.
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,110
Reactions
7,184
Points
113
Here's another angle on this thread. If you aren't wanting to make predictions, but what about things you're most looking forward to see, whether questions or just situations/dynamics?

For me I'm excited to see how Fonzie does - and really looking forward to his first matches against Sincaraz. I'm also really hoping he gets at least one match against Novak before the old Serb hangs up his racquet.

I'm also interested about the Sincaraz dynamic, and how Carlos will do in a post-Ferrero world. But I can also see "Sincaraz fatigue" in the not-too-distant future, and am looking forward to someone breaking up the hegemony, if only for a single Slam before Sincaraz locks that that shit up again.

I'm curious about how Fils will come back, and if he can not only get back to where he was in late 2024-early 25, but take it up a notch and break into the top 10. Might be a tall order for this year, but you never know.

I'm curious to see if Bublik can stabilize his newfound "focus" and if Vacherot can maintain a top 30 form.

And then there's more, but I own an embarrassing share of the text on this page so I'll stop (for now).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,110
Reactions
7,184
Points
113
My post disappeared? for some reason
The reason I addressed Moxie and Kieran we are all Rafa fans:)
I also listened to both Roddick and Gil Gross opinions.and others on the subject.
I also have concerns that Carlos Father dosent interfere, with his sons ongoing career, apparently there has been tension between JCF and Carlos father over the past 2 years.
Personally I still feel at this stage of his career he still needs a more structured coach, Lopez on the other hand is more relaxed which balances the coaching arrangement.
Time will tell, Andy Murray's name was mentioned, I cant see that happening.
Yeah, Andy's decline was 100% due to the hip injury. I think too much has been made about him over-playing in 2016 to reach #1, that the hip injury was more due to wear and tear from 10+ years of grinding, attritional tennis. And he didn't as much decline early as suddenly. He turned 30 in 2017, an age that most players are in some stage of decline.

I don't disagree with you about what Carlos needs, but my point is you have to consider what he WANTS...and I think right now, he wants to stand on his own two feet without a father figure pushing him. If that doesn't work, we can hope he rectifies before it is too late. But who knows, maybe it works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
52,802
Reactions
33,591
Points
113
Yeah, Andy's decline was 100% due to the hip injury. I think too much has been made about him over-playing in 2016 to reach #1, that the hip injury was more due to wear and tear from 10+ years of grinding, attritional tennis. And he didn't as much decline early as suddenly. He turned 30 in 2017, an age that most players are in some stage of decline.

I don't disagree with you about what Carlos needs, but my point is you have to consider what he WANTS...and I think right now, he wants to stand on his own two feet without a father figure pushing him. If that doesn't work, we can hope he rectifies before it is too late. But who knows, maybe it works.
Agree Carlos is a young adult and he has the right to consider what he wants now, and it would not surprise me if it dosent work out, he brings JCF back into the fold,
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,110
Reactions
7,184
Points
113
Of course all of this could be speculating about Carlos. Maybe it is simpler than that, and, I don't know, Juan Carlos cock-blocked him at an Ibiza party...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Moxie

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
45,357
Reactions
16,051
Points
113
Agree Carlos is a young adult and he has the right to consider what he wants now, and it would not surprise me if it dosent work out, he brings JCF back into the fold,
Basically, what El Dude said above: it's not what Carlos needs that we're addressing, but what he appears to want, though we're all speculating. When I say that Rafa is intense, I mean that in the best way. It's one of his best x-factors beyond tennis/athletic talent, and a reason he has 22 Majors. I don't think I said he was "too intense," but if I did, I meant too intense for what Alcaraz seems to be looking for. Otherwise, stick with JCF.

There is more speculation out there that this was a contractual dispute, which makes me sad. But it could be a combination of that, and Carlitos wanting to get out from under the yoke of a father figure, a bit. Is it the right move? In my opinion, not really. However, we did read that JCF did try to stifle Alcaraz a bit by trying to get him to play "safer" tennis, and it didn't really work. He does need to be given his head, a bit, which they learned. We'll see how this next phase goes. I don't know, however, if he can ask Ferrero back. There seemed to be hard feelings upon parting, which is sad. I hope that doesn't last.
 

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
52,802
Reactions
33,591
Points
113
Basically, what El Dude said above: it's not what Carlos needs that we're addressing, but what he appears to want, though we're all speculating. When I say that Rafa is intense, I mean that in the best way. It's one of his best x-factors beyond tennis/athletic talent, and a reason he has 22 Majors. I don't think I said he was "too intense," but if I did, I meant too intense for what Alcaraz seems to be looking for. Otherwise, stick with JCF.

There is more speculation out there that this was a contractual dispute, which makes me sad. But it could be a combination of that, and Carlitos wanting to get out from under the yoke of a father figure, a bit. Is it the right move? In my opinion, not really. However, we did read that JCF did try to stifle Alcaraz a bit by trying to get him to play "safer" tennis, and it didn't really work. He does need to be given his head, a bit, which they learned. We'll see how this next phase goes. I don't know, however, if he can ask Ferrero back. There seemed to be hard feelings upon parting, which is sad. I hope that doesn't last.
Quite frankly Moxie is is a sad mess on both sides. JCF has taken to social media on 3 occasions of late, it seems like he has lost his 'son' and is grieving. I think we were all blind sided by the parting. Carlos had his best year on tour and got back to No 1 which he deserved, and the news that the partnership had ended rocked the tennis world. Actually I thought JCF and Lopez were a balanced coaching team, Lopez more relaxed
Carlos is a adult and he is free to make his choices, maybe he needs this time to work out what he needs and wants, we have all done that in our life choices and careers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie