Riotbeard said:
Kieran said:
Maybe you misjudge him, alright. :dodgy:
He's making a fair comment, and over the years other players have qualified for the year end tourney by having great results on clay, but it's always played on the same surface. It changes venue, but not surface, etc. I don't agree with him, but I think you're all going to far and unfair on your anti-Rafa bias...
While the posters referenced might have some kind of anti-Rafa bias in general. I have to agree with Fiero. Rafa is so successful that these kind of complaints make him seem a little ungrateful and spoiled, even if there might be something reasonable underlying it.
Buddy, they all complain. On a sunny day in Paris, Novak moans if it doesn't rain. He gesticulates and cries about it, telling them, make it even fake rain! :laydownlaughing
Fact is, any appeals to tradition or whatever always was in this, are silly, not to mention misunderstanding tennis history. For example, brother Nehmeth's reply about how long it's been played on one surface (except when it was played on another one, and another one, etc). The answer to this is obvious: for a century the US Open was played on grass, then it went to clay, next year it goes indoor. The tourney we all associate with tradition - Wimbledon - had an indoor final in 2012. I don't need to go on with this.
A short indoor season isn't an answer either because I doubt many people complained when it went outdoors in 2003-2004.
Now, to be clear, I don't agree with Rafa and said so, but it's the usual anti-Rafa mob ganging up again, unfairly, as well as incoherently, rather than actually taking the time to think about what he's saying, which maybe self-centred (unlike Novak on a sunny day in Paris :snicker ) but still has a kernel of sense.
And of course, in 20 years from now when the WhatTheFeck is played in Spain, on clay, the same people will sit in front of their telly like this -