Graf v Seles - Legacy and Slam Counts

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
28,297
Reactions
6,856
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
This thread is to discuss the legacies of Steffi Graf and Monica Seles. I write this largely from a "Graf fan" perspective, but feel free to challenge the numbers and rationale.

Starting at the top, with the horrific event - On April 20th 1993, during a Quarter Final with Magdalena Maleeva in Hamburg, the World Number 1 of Ladies Tennis, Monica Seles was stabbed between the shoulders with a boning knife by Gunther Parche, a crazed fan of Seles’s main rival Steffi Graf.

The knife wound healed within a couple of weeks (physically), but it would take a further two years before Seles was able to overcome the psychological impact of the attack and return to the sport.

Many (including my old friend @Federberg) have queried what Monica Seles would have achieved if the attack had never taken place, reassessing her place in the game and the major tournaments she may have won.

The flip side is that much of the commentary has also focused on what Steffi Graf would or indeed wouldn’t have won, together with a reassessment of her count of 22 major titles.

Two particular quotes stood out. One attributed to Pam Shriver – “She [Seles] was dominating Steffi Graf, who, prior to Seles, dominated everyone else.” A second quote, regurgitated from back in 2001 courtesy of Sports Ilustrated’s Frank Deford, questioned, “Was Graf the best female player of all time? She wasn’t even the best in the heart of her career.“... together with comments from countless unofficial commentators and forum members.

So how secure is Steffi Graf’s legacy?

Other commentators, bloggers, and fans have tried to analyse Monica Seles’s career trajectory had the frenzied attack by Parche never occurred, thus sizing up the impact it would have made on the contents of the Graf trophy cabinet. So let’s take a look at the match-up between these two greats and analyse with a little more rigour, the major titles that Steffi Graf actually won during the course of her career.

Let’s break it down and take a look at how Monica and Steffi fared in their individual head to head matchup. Is Pam Shriver right? Was Seles the dominant player in this category?

H2H:

Lifetime:
Graf 10 v Seles 5
Before the stabbing: Graf 6 v Seles 4
After the stabbing: Graf 4 v Seles 1
During Seles years where she was year end #1 (91 & 92): Graf 3 v Seles 1
During Seles entire reign as World #1: (91,92, part 93): Graf 3 v Seles 2
Matches in Majors prior to the stabbing: Graf 3 v Seles 3

Pam Shriver and the Urban Myth

However you analyse this match-up, Shriver’s analysis that Graf was being dominated by Seles is clearly inaccurate.
On the contrary, Graf had the edge in the Head to Head, before and after the stabbing, before and during Seles tenure as World Number 1 and over the course of their careers.

Monica Seles ascended to the top by dominating the rest of the field. No question. However, she did not dominate Steffi Graf. There are similar parallels with the period where Roger Federer dominated the entire field but failed to dominate arch-rival Rafael Nadal. In fact, Graf actually has a better winning percentage over Seles than Nadal has over Federer.

Inspecting the numbers exposes Pam Shriver’s take on the rivalry to little more than reaffirming an urban myth.

The Steffi Graf Major Count


Steffi Graf finished with 22 majors. Monica finished her career with 9 major titles. In discussions online and offline a popular pastime among tennis fans and observers is to undertake some fictional re-assessment and revised slam counts for both players based on the What if… theory. Typically, these discussions can attract wild assessments – often revising Graf’s major count down significantly and awarding Monica hypothetical titles she never won on court.

So let’s take a look at each of Graf’s major successes and see if the count bears merit…

Steffi Graf had already won 11 grand slam titles before the stabbing including a golden grand slam (all 4 majors and the Olympic title) in 1988. She had also completed a career grand slam twice over (winning all four majors at least twice). These successes alone put her among the greatest players ever.

Banked: 11 Majors

So we are secure that at this stage, Graf already has 11 majors in the bank.

After the stabbing incident, Graf won an addititional 3 Wimbledon titles (1993, 1995 1996). I’d suggest these should be added to our bank without further question. Seles was not a top grass court player and in her two grass court meetings with Graf she had been trounced 6-0, 6-1 and 6-2, 6-1. The latter drubbing occurred while Seles was ranked #1. Seles' two-handed forehand is not an asset on grass.

There is no relevant argument to be made in suggesting those titles would have been banked by Seles if the stabbing had never occurred. Certainly not a strong enough one to award her all Graf's Wimbledon titles when she never won one at all.

Banked: 14 Majors

We now have a further 8 majors to dissect, so let’s continue with the least likely ones where a case to be made in favor of Monica Seles.

In my opinion, this begins with the 1999 French Open.

Graf faced off against Seles in the semi-final and prevailed 6-7 6-3 6-4. This was six years after the stabbing and a match Seles went into as not only favourite, but carrying a higher ranking than Graf. Steffi was playing out her last year on the tour and made history by becoming the first player in the open era to defeat the first, second, and third ranked players in the same Grand Slam tournament. This one belongs to Graf who defeated her younger rival during her WTA swansong.

Banked: 15 Majors.

This leaves 7 majors on the list:

Four of these took place when Seles was out of the sport following the stabbing:
1993 French Open, 1993 US Open, 1994 Australian Open, 1995 French Open

Another three took place after Seles had returned to the sport.
1995 US Open, 1996 French Open, 1996 US Open

Looking first at the US Opens, it’s fair to say, Monica Seles was a superlative player on hardcourts, in particular on the slower hardcourt surfaces such as the Rebound Ace at the Australian Open. However, the faster the court got, the more it suited Steffi Graf.

During the 1995 and 1996 US Open Championships, Graf actually beat Seles, and this — compounded by the fact that during their career rivalry, the German never lost a match to Seles on faster hardcourts — makes it very difficult to lean toward the Serb.
Did the 1995 and 1996 US Opens reflect the real Monica Seles?

She ripped through the field as in her best years without dropping a single set in either tournament only to have to square off against her main rival Graf in both finals. She had won her previous US Opens in similar fashion, but without having to face Graf in final.

The judgement is that these US Opens stay with Graf. If Graf had not made those finals (as had been the case during Seles’s rise to prominence) then Monica would have won 3 majors in just over a year (including her Australian title) – not unlike her major gathering rampages during 1991 and 1992.

The 1993 US Open also remains with Graf on the same basis. Monica never beat Steffi Graf at Flushing Meadows or on a fast hardcourt during their career – before or after the stabbing. There is no hard evidence to support Monica Seles beating Steffi Graf in a US Open Final. Not enough at least to give them hypothetically to Seles.

Banked: 18 Majors

This leaves us with the 1993 French Open, 1994 Australian Open, 1995 French Open and the 1996 French Open.

Monica was #2 seed going into the 1996 French Open but suffered a surprise exit in the Quarter Finals. She also struggled throughout the earlier rounds. The background to the story was that she had suffered a shoulder injury in Tokyo shortly after winning the Australian Open. This severely hampered her preparations for Roland Garros. Indeed, she only started playing tennis a week before the French Open began and there were concerns she’d not be be able to play at all. In a nutshell, she was both coming back from injury and rusty. Needless to say, this had nothing to do with the stabbing three years earlier.

Again, this is Steffi Graf’s title.

Banked: 19 Majors

This leaves us the final three tournaments – The 1993 French Open, 1994 Australian Open and the 1995 French Open.

These, I would suggest are the only three titles that should really be up for discussion; tournaments where a genuinely justified case for Monica Seles could be made.

Personally I’m loathe to even consider hypothetically taking titles away from a great champion like Steffi Graf, particularly since they were won on court rather than via conversations on message boards, bars and commentary booths, but if I had to tip a wink to Monica Seles, it would be here. So therein lies the question…

Banked: 19 Majors + ? or 22 – ?

Monica Seles Career Trajectory​

Many commentators, analysts, fans make a dangerous assumption that Monica Seles would have continued her superb form for years thereafter. This is freezing time and entering the realms of a parallel universe. If John McEnroe had been stabbed in 1984, people would have given him a bunch of hypothetical titles thereafter. The real winners would never have got their real kudos. Mats Wilander is another prime example of a player who in 1988 won three majors in a single year. He never won another.

Monica’s weight gain and future injuries are additional oversights. In her book, she acknowledged her biggest battle was with her own weight. Another major event occurred in Monica’s life with her father and coach passing away to cancer. Monica highlighted a spiraling depression and subsequent weight gain. At one point she had put on 40 lbs. This was another telling factor in her decline following the comeback.

Conclusion​

Monica Seles’s stabbing at the hands of a crazed Graf fanatic robbed us of a great player at her best. It robbed her of two prime years, and interrupted a rivalry that was going from strength to strength. It probably robbed her of some additional majors.

This piece has been written more in relation to the legacy of Steffi Graf. Of course, Monica may have added to her silverware at Graf’s expense, but I think upon further analysis, the opportunities were far less than casually reported.

She probably would have also added additional titles from competitions where Graf wasn’t a factor.

In short, she would likely have won more… but it doesn’t take much away from Graf’s overall legacy. Both were great players and well deserving of their places in the Hall of Fame.
 
Last edited:

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
16,679
Reactions
6,497
Points
113
I don't hate anybody based on my interpretation of the word (and I know @mrzz is a little tongue in cheek with this stuff) but here goes...

Nadal - used to irritate me, largely because of his antitode to Federer - so fanboy rivalry definitely is a major factor here. I've warmed to the bloke's legacy since he retired - but if I use Squash as an allegory - Nadal was the Jansher Khan to Federer's Jahangir Khan. One is the attacking "make things happen" to the other one's absorb and counter punch. That may seem harsh to Nadal but it was the way I felt. I love aggressive attacking intent.

John Isner - I just felt pain and the life being sucked out of me when I watched this bloke. I had the same feeling watching Reilly Opelka the other day. That slow hangdog expression between points. Everything seemed painful... even wiping his face with a towel seemed like an effort.

Raonic - As above but not quite to the same extent - but I found the lack of sportsmanship an issue. And I'm being kind.

Never particularly warmed to players like Davydenko, David Ferrer etc...

On the women's side - Monica Seles. The excessive grunting. Plus everybody handing her hypothetical slams she never won on court. Sure, the stabbing was awful, but a fit Graf was a better player anyway.

Serena - I liked Serena when she was younger but not when she got older. Her attitude toward officials sucked down the track.

Justine Henin - For reasons other have already stated. Like her backhand though.

Naomi Osaka - Seems to prod and provoke and then fall back into victim mode.
don't start a Seles v Graff war mate. I'll drone the eff out of you:face-with-tears-of-joy: But for the stabbing, Graff wouldn't have gone past Evert and Navratilova. I wager Seles and Graf would have matched numbers around the other two (in my opinion, GOATs of the time).
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Moxie

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
28,297
Reactions
6,856
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
don't start a Seles v Graff war mate. I'll drone the eff out of you:face-with-tears-of-joy: But for the stabbing, Graff wouldn't have gone past Evert and Navratilova. I wager Seles and Graf would have matched numbers around the other two (in my opinion, GOATs of the time).
Lol. Been down that path numerous times in the past squire. Seles barely dents Graf numbers even hypothetically if you break it down seriously without being a romantic.
 

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
16,679
Reactions
6,497
Points
113
Lol. Been down that path numerous times in the past squire. Seles barely dents Graf numbers even hypothetically if you break it down seriously without being a romantic.
I don't want to go down the path to war either. But obviously I strongly disagree. I lived the rivalry. Seles was taking everything from her but her dinner. Then the stabbing. People can falsify the reality of the time however they want, but she was getting stronger and stronger. Then the tragedy. It's in the past now. Their legacies are what they are. But the counter-factual are serious
 

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
28,297
Reactions
6,856
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
I don't want to go down the path to war either. But obviously I strongly disagree. I lived the rivalry. Seles was taking everything from her but her dinner. Then the stabbing. People can falsify the reality of the time however they want, but she was getting stronger and stronger. Then the tragedy. It's in the past now. Their legacies are what they are. But the counter-factual are serious
That's also an urban myth mate. Graf led the H2H before and after the stabbing, and during the 2 years Seles ended the year at #1.

We'll start a thread to state cases and evaluate who won what and all the external circumstances... as this thread isn't probably the place for it.

But.. you did actually prove my case about awarding hypothetical slams not won on court. Imagine if McEnroe had been stabbed after 84, or Wilander after 88 - they'd be sitting on hypothetical double digits now, no doubt.

@Federberg - https://tennisfrontier.com/threads/graf-v-seles-legacy-and-slam-counts.8097/#post-561222
 
Last edited:

PhiEaglesfan712

Major Winner
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,543
Reactions
1,348
Points
113
Let's not forget one important wrinkle. Capriati self-destructing also helped Graf. If Jennifer stays on the straight and narrow, there's a good chance that she would have made the leap at some point in 1994/95/96. She was younger in those years than Iga was when she made her leap in 2022.

Capriati probably would have taken some of the slams Graf won during those years.
 

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
28,297
Reactions
6,856
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
Let's not forget one important wrinkle. Capriati self-destructing also helped Graf. If Jennifer stays on the straight and narrow, there's a good chance that she would have made the leap at some point in 1994/95/96. She was younger in those years than Iga was when she made her leap in 2022.

Capriati probably would have taken some of the slams Graf won during those years.
Graf dominated Capriati in their encounters - the H2H was 7-1 in favour of Graf. I don't really see Jennifer impacting the count... far less than Seles TBH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MargaretMcAleer

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
11,110
Reactions
7,184
Points
113
Good stuff, @britbox. I've been trying to extend my historical eye to the WTA more these days, and I can't help but see the 80s to mid-90s as a kind of Golden Era, with the overlapping primes of Evert, Navratilova, Graf, and Seles. And really, the stabbing was the sharp end of that era (with Martina retiring a year later). No one quite dominated the tour like the first three - not even Serena who, while similarly great, was more sporadic, like a jagged mountain range with sharp peaks but lots of valleys. Evert tends to be a bit under-appreciated in that her peak wasn't quite as high as Martina and Steffi, but she was incredibly consistent, and consistently pretty great - like the Tibetan plateau. I rank Martina and Steffi above those two, because she combines the best of both: Consistent high prime level with few dips, and a very high peaks - higher than Serena, in terms of overall results (we could call Serena the "Slam GOAT").

Anyhow, I tend to agree with the gist of your assessment, especially consider the dubious nature of the "urban myth" exemplified by Shriver, which is augmented by a lot of conjecture and assumptions. I do agree that we were robbed of what could very well have rivaled the WTA GOATs, but too much is put on this notion that Seles "dominated" Graf, when the actual results speak otherwise. She did have the edge at Slams for a couple years, but that's it.

What also gets understated is the personal struggles Graf went through in Seles' peak years that extended beyond their matches. People seem to forget that she didn't just lose to Seles; in 1990, she was upset in Slams by Zina Garrison and Gabriel Sabatini. Steffi was great in 1990 and still finished #1 and won 10 titles, but she wasn't quite as unbeatable as she'd been in 1987-89 when she lost all of 7 matches in a three-year span. In 1990, she lost 5: two to Seles, two to Sabatini, one to Garrison.

And then in 1991, the first of Seles two great years, Graf lost eight matches - and none to Monica (4 to Sabatini). In 1992, they split their two meetings, but I think the idea that Seles "dominated" Graf really only comes down to the fact that Monica won two of the last three Slams they played before the stabbing. But even that has a caveat: Seles two wins were very close, with the 92 US Open especially tail-biter, both going to three sets. Graf's win at 92 Wimbledon was a stomping (6-2, 6-1).

All that said, there is no doubt that Monica Seles had stratospheric talent who had the potential to be one of the very best WTA players ever. I do consider her one of the ten best players of the Open Era, just outside the "Big Five" of Court, Evert, Navratilova, Graf, and Serena Williams, and vying for #6 with Billie Jean King, depending upon how you want to weigh peak vs. longevity and factor in the lost years and potential of Seles (and I'm including the full careers of Court and King).

But to me, the WTA GOAT is either Graf or Navratilova. I go back and forth. #3-4 is Evert or Serena, with the former being more consistent and with a higher floor, and the latter having higher peak moments. Most would rank Serena above Evert, and many above Graf and Martina, but I think she's close to Evert than those two.

After those give, you have players like King, Seles, Hingis, Venus Williams, Henin, etc. Seles is hardest to rank, because she lost so much because of something entirely outside of her control. We can "What If" Hingis, who was GOAT-dominant for two or three years, but fell off due to factors that she had some say in. Similarly with Borg: he wobbled a bit in 1981 and called it quits. We can dream on a revived Borg, but in a way he failed at what the best-of-the-best succeed at: They fall and then get back up; they find away, again and again. Borg gave up. I'm not judging him, I'm just not giving him credit for what he "coulda" accomplished. Same with Hingis.

But Seles? That is harder to assess - I don't want to give her credit for what she, in the end, didn't do; but her circumstances were so unprecedented and tragic that they're impossible to ignore. But she did come back and was a fixture in the top 5 or 10 for another eight years. She was good enough and played long enough that we can't assume that she would have been significantly better. Certainly, we can assume she lost Slams in 1993-95, and probably after, but how many? Five? Fifteen? People like Shriver talk about it like the latter was a foregone conclusion, but we'll simply never known.
 
  • Like
Reactions: britbox

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
45,357
Reactions
16,051
Points
113
Based on what I just read in the "players you hate" thread, you just stuck your hand in a hot one! :popcorn
 
  • Like
Reactions: britbox

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
28,297
Reactions
6,856
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
Seles two wins were very close, with the 92 US Open especially tail-biter, both going to three sets. Graf's win at 92 Wimbledon was a stomping (6-2, 6-1).
Just a quick correction - that was Roland Garros. Seles never beat Graf at the USO, or on a particularly fast hardcourt ever. She beat Graf twice on hards (both times on Rebound Ace at the AO). In the days when Lleyton Hewitt was constantly calling out the organisers to increase court speed at Melbourne Park.
This is one of the reasons why I query those who automatically assume Seles would "definitely" have won a bunch of matches at Flushing or Wimbledon against Graf, just by showing up.