Sloane Stephens the RGIII of tennis?
Sloane Stephens is discovering that it is easier to generate hype than to live up to it
For now, her struggles have been massaged into a different narrative — that Stephens is a “big tournament†player who raises her game for grand slams. This idea is a compliment to the enormity of Stephens’ talent, but if she realized early in her career that she had the ability to be a top-20 player for the next 10 years, she is also discovering that her game is nowhere near good enough to make her a transcendent, elite player. Stephens is finding that talent is not enough. And much like with [Redskins quarterback Robert] Griffin, Stephens is watching as other less hyped players such as Eugenie Bouchard and Simona Halep produce better results.
As for Stephens, she did not Sputnik after beating Serena; she never got off the ground. The hype machine enjoyed a short Williams-Stephens Twitter spat, but the throne-abdication plotline turned out to be nothing more than words and pictures. Stephens hasn't challenged Williams. She hasn't yet won a WTA tournament. She hasn't even reached a final. In the 22 tournaments she has played since beating Williams in Australia, Stephens has been eliminated in the first or second round nine times.
But Griffin and Stephens can still learn. In a landscape of high compensation and attention for thin résumés, a premium exists on having a true anchor -- to resist the comparisons to 17-time grand slam winners, to dismiss the significance of NFL jersey sales, to remember and believe that being an athlete is far different from being a celebrity, and that doing the work is still the ultimate reward.
http://espn.go.com/tennis/story/_/id/10545252/sloane-stephens-trouble-living-hype-espn-magazine
Sloane Stephens is discovering that it is easier to generate hype than to live up to it
For now, her struggles have been massaged into a different narrative — that Stephens is a “big tournament†player who raises her game for grand slams. This idea is a compliment to the enormity of Stephens’ talent, but if she realized early in her career that she had the ability to be a top-20 player for the next 10 years, she is also discovering that her game is nowhere near good enough to make her a transcendent, elite player. Stephens is finding that talent is not enough. And much like with [Redskins quarterback Robert] Griffin, Stephens is watching as other less hyped players such as Eugenie Bouchard and Simona Halep produce better results.
As for Stephens, she did not Sputnik after beating Serena; she never got off the ground. The hype machine enjoyed a short Williams-Stephens Twitter spat, but the throne-abdication plotline turned out to be nothing more than words and pictures. Stephens hasn't challenged Williams. She hasn't yet won a WTA tournament. She hasn't even reached a final. In the 22 tournaments she has played since beating Williams in Australia, Stephens has been eliminated in the first or second round nine times.
But Griffin and Stephens can still learn. In a landscape of high compensation and attention for thin résumés, a premium exists on having a true anchor -- to resist the comparisons to 17-time grand slam winners, to dismiss the significance of NFL jersey sales, to remember and believe that being an athlete is far different from being a celebrity, and that doing the work is still the ultimate reward.
http://espn.go.com/tennis/story/_/id/10545252/sloane-stephens-trouble-living-hype-espn-magazine