2014 Indian Wells Masters Final: Federer v. Djokovic

Who do you pick?


  • Total voters
    22

Riotbeard

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
4,810
Reactions
12
Points
38
herios said:
nehmeth said:
Front242 said:
Yeah definitely patches of very high level stuff from both but all the chunks of gunk rose to the surface of the bucket of slop, drowning out most of the good in the end. Dunno about Isner but I read Karlovic places a towel down the T and just aims for it serve after serve.

Nice description of the match... I'm seeing pigs again. Seems difficult for both of them to play well at the same time.

Isner was SO clutch in his tiebreak Saturday - not just his serve, but he was going for his shots too. I was impressed.

I have bot seen Isner - Nole, but I did Gulbis - Isner and John was just murdering those FH and could keep up many times also on the BH which is an improvement for him.
While US guys are dismal and are non competitive today in tennis, John is the exception, and he just earned a top 10 ranking again, after 2 years, with his IW performance.

Kudos to John. He is a great competitor, shame his physical limitations mean he can can only be but so good! He has been the deserved torch bearer for U.S. tennis, since Mardy's health issues.
 

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
27,362
Reactions
6,148
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
masterclass said:
The result? A very even match. It could have gone either way in the end. Even stats were very even, almost even # of games won/lost, exact same winners/unforced error ratio, with Federer's amounts predictably higher, almost even # of total points won, Djokovic 99 points, 98 for Federer, etc.

Yeah, they don't get much closer. Very even match. I left part way through but have watched it on Pavlink's video. Federer is moving so much better than last year and hitting the ball with greater authority.

masterclass said:
Commiserations to Roger and his supporters. I don't think this loss hurts him a lot. He played a good tournament, just missed, so his level looks good going into his next training block before his clay season starts in Madrid. He said he had not expected to be at his best level till after the next training block so to have these good results prior to that was a bit of a surprise to him.

Agreed - I think Federer would have taken a Dubai title and an Indian Wells final at the start of the year.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
16,880
Reactions
7,080
Points
113
Exactly. He's doing well this year, and the key word you use - authority - that's what he lacked last year. His confidence is rising...
 

britbox

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
27,362
Reactions
6,148
Points
113
Location
Gold Coast, Australia
Post match interviews:

Novak Djokovic:

[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZJXMtHAiKI[/video]

Roger Federer:

[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lPSF1QsoAk[/video]
 

Sundaymorningguy

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
6,322
Reactions
1,648
Points
113
Location
Norfolk, VA
It is so interesting to watch the comings and goings of Djokovic's confidence. He really seems to have these confidence bursts at the most random moments, yet he also seems to lose his confidence at the most random moments these days. I hope he finds his mental game in time for the French as he is the only one of the Big 4 who gives Nadal a run for his money on clay. I want to see him vindicated for last year's French.
 

nehmeth

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
8,399
Reactions
1,369
Points
113
Location
State College, PA
Excellent analysis of the match:
http://www.atpworldtour.com/News/Tennis/2014/03/12/Indian-Wells-Brain-Game-Federer-Djokovic.aspx



BRAIN GAME ANALYSIS
BRAIN GAME: DJOKOVIC FORCES FEDERER BACK
Dubai, U.A.E.
by Craig O'Shannessy | 17.03.2014


Novak Djokovic forced Roger Federer back as he turned the match around against the Swiss.
Novak Djokovic’s thrilling victory over Roger Federer in the final of the BNP Paribas Open Sunday afternoon focused on the key strategy of keeping the Swiss star back behind the baseline as much as possible as the match unfolded.

Djokovic won 3-6, 6-3, 7-6(3) and nothing contributed more to his narrow victory than his ability to turn the match into a grinding backcourt battle after Federer had attacked at will in the opening set.

Djokovic won only one more point than Federer (99 to 98) for the match and it wasn’t until he broke serve for the first time to go ahead 5-3 in the second set that the Serb really was able to sink his teeth into the match. Federer had remarkably held serve 33 straight times in the tournament until then.

Federer came out hot and swarmed the net early in the match, racing to a 3-0 and 4-1 lead before winning the opening set 6-3 without facing a break point on serve. It was vintage Federer, hitting 12 crushing winners including four forehand and two backhand winners and he attacked the net at every opportunity. An aggressive chip and charge backhand return off a second serve at deuce in the second game led to the first break of serve for the match for the Swiss maestro.

But everything from serving and volleying, approaching and playing right on the baseline became less prolific as the match progressed, as Djokovic slowly but surely improved with hitting deeper, making more first serves and extending rallies which suited his grinding mentality from the baseline.

Court position is something that is controlled by both players - the determination of Federer to move forward, even an inch, and also the depth of shot that Djokovic was presenting him with. In the opening set, Djokovic was only able to get 24 per cent of his groundstrokes to land closer to the baseline than the service line, which let Federer successfully hunt the short ball. But as Djokovic slowly but surely improved his strategy and execution, he was able to increase his depth to 35 per cent of shots landing closer to the baseline in the second set. This significantly slowed the Federer blitz down.

Djokovic’s depth definitely played a factor in keeping Federer from getting to the net as the match progressed.
Federer Attacking the Net (approaching + serve and volley).

Sets Attacking The Net Won Average Per Game
Set 1 13 6 1.4 times/game
Set 2 6 3 0.66 times/game
Set 3 12 7 0.92 times/game
(note – 3rd set tiebreaker counted as one game).

The ability to keep Federer off the net in the second set, with less than half the approaches he achieved in the first set, was an important strategy for Djokovic to get back in the match. To keep him back around 65 per cent as much in the third set as he averaged per game in the first set was another key factor in such a tight finish.

Baseline Points
Federer’s efficiency at the baseline also declined as Djokovic figured out how to attack Federer deep to his backhand corner (20 backhand errors) and also run him hard wide in the deuce court attacking his forehand (29 forehand errors).

Baseline Points (89) – Points ending with both players at the baseline.

Baseline Points Won Djokovic Won Point Federer Won Point
Set 1 7 10
Set 2 17 13
Set 3 23 19
Total 47 42
Climbing The Ladder
Hawk-Eye visualisation confirmed that the more Federer stays up around and inside the baseline, the better chance he has of winning the point. When the pair last played in semi-finals of Dubai less than a month ago, Federer lost the opening set with relatively poor court position – making contact with the ball 80 per cent behind the baseline and 20 per cent inside. But in the next two sets that he won he moved forward considerably and averaged 67 per cent behind the baseline and 33 per cent inside.

In the first set of the Indian Wells final yesterday, Federer had his most aggressive set of all, making contact 62 per cent behind the baseline and 38 per cent inside. But the second set and up to around half way through the third saw Djokovic pushing him back again, forcing the Swiss to hit 73 per cent behind the baseline and only 27 per cent inside.

Djokovic’s ability to arm-wrestle how the points are constructed to favour his style of play was the key element in deciding which of these two titans of the game would ultimately triumph in such a prestigious event.

Craig O'Shannessy uses extensive tagging, metrics and formulas to uncover the patterns and percentages behind the game. Read more at www.braingametennis.com.

[/b]
 

pavlik89

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Jan 12, 2014
Messages
2,839
Reactions
3
Points
38
[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXB15yulNG4[/video]