Tag: wta

  • Serena Williams Withdraws from Tokyo

    Serena Williams Withdraws from Tokyo

    World No. 1 Serena Williams withdrew on Thursday from the Pan Pacific Open, in Tokyo, citing fatigue, reported Japan’s Kyodo news agency.

    “I’m disappointed to have to withdraw from the Pan Pacific Open, which I was very much looking forward to playing this year. Unfortunately with the number of matches I have played throughout the summer I need more time to properly recover,” Williams said.

    [divider]

    Discuss Serena William’s withdrawal from the Pan Pacific Open in our discussion forum.

    [divider]

    Credits: Cover Photo: Edwin Martinez1 (Creative Commons License)

  • Serena Williams Wins the US Open

    Serena Williams Wins the US Open

    Serena Williams fought Victoria Azarenka, the wind, and her nerves to win her 17th Major title.

    [divider]

    Serena Williams has won her fifth US Open crown with a hard fought victory over world No. 2 Victoria Azarenka, 7-5, 6-7(6), 6-1, in a match lasting 2 hours and 45 minutes.  Oddly, it was the first time that the world No. 1 and No. 2 had faced each other in a US Open final in 10 years.

    It didn’t come easy. Serena had to overcome blustery weather conditions, unforced errors, and a very stubborn opponent in the Belorussian. Twice in the second set she served for the match but Azarenka broke her both times to force a deciding set.

    Azarenka had beaten Williams recently in Cincinnati in a three-set thriller but fell behind early in the final set and could not recover. Williams finally sealed the match when an Azarenka return sailed long.

    Williams increased her Grand Slam count to 17, one fewer than Chris Evert and Martina Navratilova on the all-time list, and jumped for joy on winning her fifth US Open title.

    [divider]

    Discuss the US Open Final on the Tennis Frontier Message Forums.

    [divider]

    Cover Photo: edplain (Creative Commons License)

  • Life on the Big Stage

    Life on the Big Stage

    Day One at the US Open 2013

    You know you’re a tennis fan when, on a crisp August evening, under a plumb colored sky, you’re sitting at the Greek Theatre in Berkeley, California, where cello virtuoso Yo-Yo Ma introduces his quartet, The Goat Rodeo Sessions, by saying, “I bet you’ve never seen four goats on a stage before,” and your immediate reaction is to look around for Roger Federer—or Rafael Nadal; or Serena; or even Djokovic.

    [divider]

    You can discuss this and more on our tennis message boards.

    [divider]

    Yep, that’s how you know you’re a tennis fan: you have forgotten that goats exist in the real world, where they have four legs and horns, and don’t know a forehand from a fingerboard. As it was explained to the audience, a “goat rodeo” is a metaphor for a risky and chaotic situation, not unlike the creative process, or an arena filled with angry goats and cowboys, or Super Saturday at the US Open. In fact, I’m pretty sure the musicians named their collaboration in honor of an especially blustery Super Saturday. You know what it’s like, when courts boil and roil from the inside, hurricanes blow from the outside, and the world’s best players don’t get to play much tennis. That’s essentially the definition of a goat rodeo.

    Along with Edgar Meyer on bass, Stuart Duncan on fiddle, and Chris Thile—the only mandolin player I’ve ever seen perform while wearing a meticulously tailored hipster suit—Mr. Ma played two hours of music that was almost as exciting as the running slice-slash-stab passing shot Rafael Nadal hit off Ryan Harrison’s overhead smash to earn the first of many, many break points on the American’s serve. But though Nadal did hit several thrilling shots, I have to admit that overall, the single set of music performed by The Goat Rodeo Sessions on Saturday was more engaging than all three sets of the Nadal-Harrison match. I should point out, before I upset a significant number of my readers, this was not Rafa’s fault.

    Perched— and chirping away—in the ESPN booth, John McEnroe made the accurate observation that there is simply not a single thing that Harrison does anywhere near as well as Nadal does everything. Ryan Harrison is now 0-20 against Top 10 opponents, a stat he might appreciate more if those losses had occurred at a slightly more advanced stage of important tennis tournaments. When asked, Harrison is always quick to point out that he relishes playing the best “on the big stage,” but I bet he’d trade the biggest and the best for a shot at the second round, or more importantly, a better split-step after his serve.

    Shortly after Nadal broke Harrison’s serve and then held his own with ease, McEnroe went on to note— with a delightful disregard for sense—that Ryan Harrison has never won a five set match, and therefore “the longer this goes, the worse it gets for Harrison.” Fortunately for the 21-year-old, it didn’t go on very long. Nadal won 6-4, 6-2, 6-2 in just over two hours. Harrison actually lost the final point from the seated position, having toppled over just in time to watch Nadal bury a short ball in the opposite corner of the court.

    To go on citing opinions of broadcast commentators, one of the online ESPN announcers (possibly Taylor Dent) said that while Nadal is playing for the title, Harrison is playing for respect. This struck me as a poor choice of motivators for the 21-year-old. After all, it presumes an essential lack in the self that has nothing to do with tennis technique. If he’s not playing to win—which would make a kind of sense in this case—Harrison should be playing to better understand himself, not to try to get other people to understand him better.

    In any case, the one-sided nature of the contest made it difficult to judge the Spaniard’s form, but two hours and five minutes was plenty of time for me to form a decided opinion on Rafa’s new pointillist headband: I like it. Like a well-tailored hipster suit on a mandolin player, it works.

    What hasn’t worked, on account of the rain delay, was my plan to steal everything Yo-Yo Ma said during his between-song chats at the Greek Theatre — Ma is hands down the jolliest and most insightful world-famous cello player I have ever heard talk about goats— and apply it to the GOATs who were to perform on the Arthur Ashe stage during Day 1 of the Open. Mr. Ma spoke eloquently about his continued love of playing his instrument, and of the undying human need for invention and risk. He said our passions deserve practice, and referred to himself as an old goat who never wanted to stop learning new tricks. (He put both hands to his head as he said this last bit, index fingers pointed skyward, to show us his goat horns. See, a jolly cellist.)

    I had intended to lift all these lovely Yo-Yo sentiments and stick them directly to the goatiest of all the current GOATs: Roger Federer. Had all gone according to plan, it would have been very inspirational, like a Blue Mountain card, but with horns. However, as you know, it rained. And like the Greek Theatre in Berkeley, Arthur Ashe stadium is—for now— wide open to the night sky. (Except, I’d like to point out, it does not rain in Berkeley in August.) So, no Federer primetime match, and no making little horns with my fingers while I type. (Probably easier that way.)

    Oh, what the heck. I’ll write it anyhow. How often does a tennis blogger get to use a Presidential-Medal-of-Freedom-winning classical musician discussing domesticated ruminants as her muse?

    OK, there. You probably can’t see, but I’ve just done the horns. (To do it properly you’ve got to get the index fingers aligned precisely with the edges of your eyebrows.) Now for the typing:

    Leading into the Open, there has been much talk concerning the exact moment when the 32-year-old Roger Federer ought to retire.* Yesterday, today, tomorrow, and ten years from now have all been suggested to Roger via helpful tweets. Already the Swiss has fallen to No. 7 in the rankings, which makes it statistically difficult for him to qualify for membership in the Big 4. Moreover, nobody wants to see the sheen rubbed off his GOAT coat if he tumbles any lower.

    But the problem with quitting while you’re ahead, or even quitting when there is any possibility at all of getting ahead, is that you’ll never know where you could have gone. In place of the secure knowledge that every avenue was exhausted, there will be uncertainty. And uncertainty is the GOAT of difficult states of being—most of us go to great lengths to avoid it most of the time.

    After my initial confusion about goats on the stage at the Greek Theatre, I didn’t think about tennis during The Goat Rodeo Sessions’ performance. Mostly I enjoyed the pleasure of listening to and watching four accomplished musicians work and play at something they so clearly love. But at the end of the evening, just before the encore, I did think about tennis again. The quartet finished their set with a rousing tune called Attaboy. Then, they thanked the audience for being there, and Yo-Yo Ma instructed us, with something very like joy in his voice, all to go home and always practice our passions. He sounded sincere.

    The essence of sports depends on laying down a firm line between the experiences of victory and defeat, but for a split-second I wished it didn’t. What if Federer and the Williams, and the struggling Harrison, and James Blake—who did announce his retirement, effective immediately after his final round at the Open— could all pick up their stringed instruments and collaborate—practicing, performing, and enjoying? Wouldn’t it be nice if the goal was for each person to become the best they could become on that very day, instead of “better than everyone else for all eternity”—an enterprise doomed to failure?

    Well, it would be nice. But it would also be a lot less like tennis.

    So instead, we’ll wait and watch, and be uncertain. And if Roger Federer —or Venus Williams, or James Blake, or Tommy Haas, or any other people too old to know how to twerk like Hannah Montana — do manage to win the US Open, I am going to put on my best hipster jacket, break out my mandolin, and totally pretend I know how to play it. Attaboy!

    *They say the champions –from Venus Williams to Roger Federer to Francesca Schiavone—always think they can get it back. Federer is 32. Venus and Fran are 33. But come September, Serena Williams, who allowed Schiavone only six points in six games, will also be 32-years-old. And Tommy Haas, as we all know, is 142. Age is not the only deciding factor.

  • US Open 2013 Preview: Womens draw so unpredictable

    US Open 2013 Preview: Womens draw so unpredictable

    The women’s draw is generally the hardest to predict and this year there really is a lot to consider. Along with Serena Williams, Azarenka and Sharapova we have newcomers like Sloane Stephens and Laura Robson rising fast and fearing nobody, and previous slam winners like Li Na trying new aggressive tactics.

    I think the brevity of women’s matches is an undervalued asset making the women’s game harder to dominate and upsets much easier. While it has become customary to consider it as Serena vs the rest of the world. Serena should win it barring injury. The women have not dominated like the men have. The share of the slam crowns has been much more democratic in the women’s game than the men’s. I lay that squarely with the women’s more middle distance, some times sprint nature of 3 sets compared to the men’s marathon of 5. For me it makes the men’s far too predictable and the women’s very unpredictable. Wimbledon 2013 Women’s finalists anyone?

    Alongside that, as a working father, I find it hard to keep up with the men’s game at the slams. The matches are just too long. The women’s game is fine and so I watch it throughout. I only watch the men’s game in the final stages. I just do not have the time. Even then I rarely watch the full match. Even though I find the quality of the men’s game higher the sheer quantity I have to watch is too much and there are few upsets. The women’s game encourages upsets so while the quality is lower the excitement is higher in general. It is reasons like this that some are considering whether men’s 5 set matches should be reduced?. I just don’t think the women realize how good their product is. The quality is not up with the men’s but the drama certainly is.

    [divider]

    WHAT CAN WE EXPECT?

    Serena Williams

    In terms of Serena’s dominance that just is not the case anymore. There seem to be more genuine contenders, if not to win, then to go very deep and cause upsets along the way and open up the field including challenging Serena. So let us look at some of the prospects.

    For the women Serena does not look invincible any more. She has lost to Azarenka twice on hard courts this year and almost lost to her in the final last year and of course she lost to Stosur the year before so it is hardly a given that Serena will win it. Of course the women’s has always been wide open but rarely has Serena had so much to prove. However given the Wimbledon results everyone also has so much to prove as well.

    Normally Serena goes into a slam with a dominant record against all comers. This year though she has lost more than she is used to. Particularly deep in slams. To Sloane Stephens in the quarters of Australia and Sabine Lisicki in the fourth round of Wimbledon. Then twice to Victoria Azarenka. So there are quite a few players who will feel they have a chance against her. A further twist is that she has never won this title twice in a row. Of course that stat could easily change but it could reflect the challenges of a player who is dominant on all surfaces. She does not get a rest all year and must be tired in the final stretch compared to other players who specialize. So there are a number of reasons that Serena may not be the most likely to win this time.

    She will potentially meet Sloane Stephens in the quarters again here and of course Serena won’t be getting all the home support against a fellow American player. That is a fascinating potential match. Before that it is possible Serena could meet Yaroslava Shvedova who pushed her to three sets in last years Wimbledon. Yaroslava hasn’t had the same form this year and has recently pulled out of matches indicating injury or other problems but she is a very exciting prospect who showed she isn’t afraid of Serena and has the game to push her.

    That said Serena is the best battler on tour. Her quarterfinal at the Australian Open against Sloane Stephens showed me how hard she is to beat. She got injured during the match and could not move well but Sloane still had to use everything she had to get past Serena. I do not see many female players able to narrow the court so well and put up an impenetrable wall. So, while Serena has the best weapons on tour in her serve and forehand I still feel it is how well she uses this defense that will determine her fortunes. I expect her to be pushed more than we have seen for years so how she adapts to the situation is what matters.

    [divider]

    Victoria Azarenka 

    Victoria Azarenka (Vika) is surely the WTA version of Novak Djokovic. She is supremely consistent, hits hard all the time and is in the form of her life. She no longer fears anyone in a final. Bring on Serena, bring on any one. She showed me in the Australian Open her professional attitude. How she beat Sloane Stephens was not pretty. It was not worthy of the world number one but she also showed Sloane’s lack of experience.

    In the final Vika faced not one but two injury time outs. How about that for disrupting your rhythm. Vika just got on with it. Where Sloane sat down, Victoria kept her feet moving. Practiced a few shots and kept her mind active. She is prone to choking but she handled it and you can not ask for more.

    So, on hard courts and where she served for the US Open title last year I expect her to do well this year. If she makes the final and is fit then it is hard to bet against her.

    Maria Sharapova is in that place where Andy Murray used to be. She can dominate all below her except the number one. She just can not beat Serena. Of course you can point out that all streaks come to an end. Masha’s game is perfect for hard courts and she has won here before so in theory she could beat Serena here. Especially if Serena has her usual lull in the second set. Of course if Serena does not make the final then Maria fears no one else. She will be ready and it could go either way.

    [divider]

    Agnieska Radwanska

    Agnieska Radwanska has an amazing game but without adding power I think she has reached her limit. She is an amazing counter puncher able to use an opponents weapons against them but she lacks the ability to dictate. 7 matches in a world class field is too much for her game. She will always have at least one poor game during the tournament. Who doesn’t but there will always be someone ready to hit her off the court or just not miss anything and leave nothing for her. Agga will most likely fall to that player. I hope I am wrong because she is a breath of fresh air but, at least for now I do not see that she has enough answers on the biggest stages against the top players.

    [divider]

    Li Na

    Last night I watched Li Na in her first round encounter against Sofia Arvidsson. What a difference Carlos Rodriguez has made. Li Na was using serve and volley and I could not believe my eyes. It worked very well against her lower ranked opponent. I certainly agree with the tactic but only time will tell if it is ready for the big time yet. Li is a slam champion and always a contender. I include her here simply because she is trying something different with a legendary coach. She is already potent from the back. This surprise factor at the net could pose serious questions for her opponents if she makes it deep in the draw. Probably too early for the new tactic to be reliable but very exciting for the future if she sticks with it.

    [divider]

    Sloane Stevens

    I find Sloane Stephens very exciting. She is a precocious rising star that plays well on a big stage. She is deceptively powerful. but uses her opponents strengths against them ala Radwanska. She is a threat not only due to her ranking but her Semi final appearance at the Australian Open this year. She was taught a lesson by Victoria Azarenka that I do not think she will forget quickly.

    I find she reads the game very well and has a good balance between risk and recovery. She can dictate when she needs but has fantastic defence and deceptively great footwork. I am certainly hoping she goes deep this year. Especially on her home ‘turf’. I don’t expect her to win the tournament but she could make the final if lots of things go her way. Particularly her scheduled encounter with Serena. She could certainly cause an upset.

    [divider]

    Laura Robson

    Of course being a Brit I have been following Laura Robson’s results for a while. But then since she won an Olympic silver medal and went deep in the US open last year who has not. We learnt that she rises to the occasion just like Sloane. While she has less variety in terms of her shots she does have a strong mind and the ability to boss the point and match. Like Sloane she has been coming to terms with her success but she seems to have a good off court approach to help her work through this part of the journey.

    Her US Open run last year where she beat former number one and US Open champ Kim Clijsters, then Li Na and pushed Former Champion Sam Stosur. So I am obviously excited for a repeat this year. To make it even sweeter Laura’s next opponent in the third round is Li Na. Both are coming from straight set wins both have power games and enjoy hard courts. What an exciting match we have in prospect.

  • Sharapova and Connors Part Ways

    Sharapova and Connors Part Ways

    Maria Sharapova’s short-lived coaching flirtation with Jimmy Connors has come to an abrupt end.

    After only a single match and a small number of practice sessions, Sharapova made the call to advise Connors his services were no longer required.

    The only match for which they were together saw the Russian world number 3 beaten by Sloane Stephens in the second round of the Cincinnati Masters.

    Connors, a former world number one and 8-time major winner, had previously coached Andy Roddick in a part-time role.

    [divider]

    Discuss the Sharapova / Connors split on our tennis forum.

  • Marion Bartoli Retires from Tennis in Shock Announcement

    Marion Bartoli Retires from Tennis in Shock Announcement

    In a stunning announcement, recently crowned Wimbledon champion Marion Bartoli has announced that she is retiring from tennis.

    Bartoli broke the news on Wednesday evening after being defeated at the Cincinnati Open by Simona Halep. She lost the second round encounter 6-3, 4-6, 1-6.

    The seventh ranked player in the world put the retirement announcement down to playing with increased pain.

    “I have pain everywhere after 45 minutes or an hour of play. It’s just body wise I just can’t do it anymore.”

    She added, “Everyone will remember my Wimbledon title. No one will remember the last match I played here. That was probably the last little bit of something that was left inside me.”

    Her retirement starts with immediate effect and she will not be contesting the US Open or any remaining tournaments.

    [divider]

    Discuss Marion’s shock retirement on our tennis message boards.

  • Lauren Davis Biofile

    Lauren Davis Biofile

    Lauren Davis at Sony Open this year after beating her friend Madison Keys.
    Lauren Davis at Sony Open this year after beating her friend Madison Keys.

     

    Status: WTA no. 76.

    DOB: Oct. 9, 1993 In: Cleveland, OH

    Ht: 5-2

    First memory of tennis: “When I was nine and a half years old I played my first tournament and I made it to the final and I was wearing these big loafers as tennis shoes. And I lost in the final and I ended up crying, I was so mad because I wanted to win so bad.”

    Tennis inspirations: “Kim Clijsters. I think she was one of my favorites. She’s just an all around amazing person, so down to earth. And Roger Federer, of course.”

    Last book read: “I read Gaby Douglas’ book after she won the Olympics.”

    Current car: “A Volkswagen Antigua (white).”

    First famous tennis player you met or encountered: “Kim Clijsters. (Where?) Miami. When I was eleven, maybe. I came to watch her and she was signing autographs.”

    Favorite ice cream flavor: “Oreo.”

    Greatest career moment (so far): “Probably, so far, when I won Orange Bowl 2010. I won quite a few matches in a row and it was really a fulfilling feeling. It was really nice.”

    Most painful moment: “Can’t think of one. I mean, every time you lose is very painful.”

    Favorite tournaments: “Indian Wells, French Open, Miami.”

    Funny tennis memory: “I have gotten pooped on by birds quite a few times. During the match [smiles].”

    Strangest match: “No. Nothing comes to mind.”

    Closest tennis friends: “Madison Keys is one of my really good friends. Allison Riske. And Melanie Oudin.”

    Funniest players encountered: “Andrea Petkovic. She’s funny.”

    Favorite sport outside of tennis: “Soccer.”

    Three athletes you like to watch & follow: “Ray Lewis is my all time favorite. (Why?) Just his personality, it’s so amazing. He’s such a fighter, he’s fought so much adversity and hopefully I get the chance to meet him soon because he lives in Miami. Roger Federer. And Beckham.”

    Why do you love playing tennis: “The feeling you get when you win a match, it tops everything, any feeling in the world, so…”

    People qualities most admired: “I like a sense of humor. And honesty. And loyalty.”

    Scoop is the founder of www.Tennis-prose.com

  • Johan Kriek on Drugs in Sport

    Johan Kriek on Drugs in Sport

    Last week, Johan was asked by two different radio hosts about his thoughts on drugs in tennis.

    MY TAKE: and I hope this sparks a serious debate about drugs in tennis before it is TOO LATE!

    Back in 1979 and 1980 there were discussions within the ATP and its leadership on how to keep tennis clean from pros using drugs (my feeling was that there were just too many “rumors” of drug use, specifically “recreational drugs”). Remember Studio 54, Miami Vice, etc….etc? All so glamorous and fun….

    The ATP in the summer of 1980 (if my memory serves me correctly) had a big meeting at the Gloucester Hotel in London the weekend before Wimbledon, and it was unanimous that any player could be randomly picked for a drug test at that time. We were the first pro sports in the history of sports to implement such drug testing rules.

    After my 5 set loss to Bjorn Borg in the 1980 US Open semifinals I was escorted by security to the Marriott Hotel at La Guardia airport to be drug tested which was strictly a urine test. I was told I was the first pro player to be tested randomly under the rules. I was perfectly happy to do so since I had absolutely nothing to hide. I never heard back from anybody which confirmed I was no drug user of any kind. But doesn’t it suck to know you are clean to be “proven innocent”…..but this was the beginning of the ATP’s drug testing path.

    With Alex Rodriguez’s situation and the decades long baseball drug suspensions, and Pete Rose’s ridiculously over the top suspension for betting while others still play who use PED’s, the NFL steroid history, and many, many deaths most likely caused by the abuse of steroids (this is all very well documented), plus the pro-cycling tour’s doping scandals, and the fact that the names of pro tennis players are starting to pop up more and more in papers. I am very concerned as a former top ATP player that this kind of publicity is going to “kill the goose that lay the golden egg.” But that is just one concern….

    I know, there are people — many, in fact — who don’t care that there are PED’s (Performance Enhancing Drugs) and openly think it is OK to let athletes use whatever they want, and let it go on like that. But here is my argument: If an athlete then decides the risks are too high, and wants to stay “clean” and compete as such, such athlete will not be competitive! Is that fair? Of course not! What about the results physically long term on a body? We know a lot of it is very bad and some may get away with being OK, but too many will suffer very negatively. I am no scientist but I hope some scientist will comment and tell us what each of these drugs can do to a body, short term and long term.

    The second argument for me is, how do I tell my own flesh and blood kids that if they want to be competitive, you better start using HGH at age 8 so you can become taller. Or that they will have to use PED’s for as long as they want to be competitive on the pro tennis tours! What kinda world will we live in? Sure, those that like to see car and train wrecks will not give a damn and will probably not mind if somebody has a ”roid-rage” episode on court or on TV in front of millions and decapitate a linesman or skewer a fan with the sharp end of a “smithereened” racket since he did not like his “cheering”!

    I don’t pretend to have the answers to this. It is a vexing and very difficult subject since it has so many issues coming with it. I see juniors in tennis and I wonder why is this girl or boy 6 foot 4 and only 14 years old, and the parents are 5’8″? Must be from the grandparents … Yeah, right …

    To what length will some of these crazy parents go to get an “advantage” for their child? And more importantly, should there be drug testing in juniors and if so, at what age should they be randomly tested? It is just mind-boggling to me to even think in these terms but that is where it is heading! What about the issue of a kid who “unknowingly” is being “fed” stuff and maybe knows and doesn’t want to do it — what then? How sickening is that! And it has happened in junior sports!

    Here is a thought for at least the ATP Tour (I cannot speak for the WTA Tour but perhaps they have issues, too):

    Have random drug tests, lots of them, for the top 250 to 500 players. Make it an industry! You drop into any of those rankings for a minute you are “fair game”. Test each person at any time, at any tournament, while on vacation, in Richard Branson’s spaceship…I don’t care. If you cannot do it, immediate suspension for two years. You refuse, lifetime suspension. You fail the test first time, lifetime suspension. Period! Make drug issues a NON-ISSUE this way. I don’t care if you are number 1 in the world or number 500, everybody gets treated the same. In order to safeguard against “influences”, spread these drug testing centers all around the world. Only very few people will know where all of them are. Perhaps switch testing centers constantly so there will not be any chance of “meddling” with results. Maybe have a minimum of 5 drug testing facilities, maybe even more. One gets a result back and it is 3-2? Adios!

    I liken this scourge of drugs in sports to a slow growing cancer. Eventually it will kill, so it is better to ”cut it out” early when noticed and treat it aggressively.

    BTW….I know I will never be asked to head the ATP so being a wishy washy politician is never going to be my philosophy. I tell it the way I see it..

    I am very worried. You may ask me why am I worried…..

    “You are done playing so why inject yourself in this, you old fart!”

    Because my whole life was/still is TENNIS! I was always told that hard work, fair play, and honor are qualities needed to succeed. Now you tell me it is irrelevant??!!

    On top of it, I am coaching future college kids, maybe even future champions! I am changing lives and now I am to feel like if I keep doing this and pros are openly using drugs all I stand for is in FULL ASSAULT and I will be IRRELEVANT in the near future!! That is completely UNACCEPTABLE!!

    Here is another issue — look what happened to a situation like Southern chef Paula Dean who had used a racial slur. She lost a HUGE amount of MONEY, companies dropped her like a hot potato, and her reputation is tarnished, perhaps for life! For a “word” she used and her life and business are destroyed!

    I sincerely hope the 4 Majors and ALL ”powers that be” in our wonderful sport start dealing with this as the HIGHEST priority in sorting this out ASAP. SPONSORS all around the world should say to the ATP Tour leaders, if this continues to “crop up” we will WALK!

    Maybe it is easier to hit them (players) hard in the “pocketbook” than it is “morally”. But that is what modern man feels the most. Sad but true: we value money more than “values” themselves…

    I hope this sparks a HUGE debate……”

    Reposted from the Johan Kriek Tennis Academy website

    [divider]

    Discuss Johan’s blog post and the subject of doping in sport/tennis on our discussion forums.

  • Women’s Draw: Cincinnati Premier / Western & Southern Open

    Women’s Draw: Cincinnati Premier / Western & Southern Open

    Serena Williams and Agnieszka Radwanska are set to meet in the semifinal in the top half; Victoria Azarenka and Maria Sharapova in the bottom half.

    [divider]

    First Quarter

    WILLIAMS, Serena (1)
    BYE

    QUALIFIER
    QUALIFIER

    BARTHEL, Mona
    SAFAROVA, Lucie

    QUALIFIER
    KIRILENKO, Maria

    STOSUR, Samantha
    KUZNETSOVA, Svetlana

    PAVLYUCHENKOVA, Anastasia
    HAMPTON, Jamie

    HALEP, Simona
    HSIEH, Su-Wei

    BYE
    BARTOLI, Marion (8)

    [divider]

    Second Quarter

    RADWANSKA, Agnieszka (4)
    BYE

    PENNETTA, Flavia
    LEPCHENKO, Varvara

    QUALIFIER
    WILLIAMS, Venus

    VESNINA, Elena
    FLIPKENS, Kirsten

    KERBER, Angelique
    QUALIFIER

    QUALIFIER
    KLEYBANOVA, Alisa

    DAVIS, Lauren
    ZAKOPALOVA, Klara

    BYE
    LI, Na (5)

    [divider]

    Third Quarter

    ERRANI, Sara (6)
    BYE

    CIBULKOVA, Dominika
    QUALIFIER

    HANTUCHOVA, Daniela
    QUALIFIER

    MATTEK-SANDS, Bethanie
    VINCI, Roberta

    JANKOVIC, Jelena
    LISICKI, Sabine

    QUALIFIER
    MAKAROVA, Ekaterina

    STEPHENS, Sloane
    QUALIFIER

    BYE
    SHARAPOVA, Maria (3)

    [divider]

    Fourth Quarter

    KVITOVA, Petra (7)
    BYE

    QUALIFIER
    SUAREZ NAVARRO, Carla

    WICKMAYER, Yanina
    CIRSTEA, Sorana

    PENG, Shuai
    WOZNIACKI, Caroline

    IVANOVIC, Ana
    CORNET, Alize

    RYBARIKOVA, Magdalena
    GOERGES, Julia

    QUALIFIER
    MLADENOVIC, Kristina

    BYE
    AZARENKA, Victoria (2)

    [divider]

    Click here to discuss the Women’s Cincinnati draw with fellow tennis fans in our discussion forum.

  • Rogers Cup – Montreal/Toronto – ATP & WTA Results – Friday, August 9

    Rogers Cup – Montreal/Toronto – ATP & WTA Results – Friday, August 9

    Today’s ATP matches [See below for WTA] Scores added as known.

    (WC) V Pospisil (CAN) d N Davydenko (RUS) — 3-0 Ret.
    (11) M Raonic (CAN) d E Gulbis (LAT) — 7-6(3), 4-6, 6-4
    (1) N Djokovic (SRB) d (7) R Gasquet (FRA) — 6-1, 6-2
    (4) R Nadal (ESP) d (Q) M Matosevic (AUS) — 6-2, 6-4

    [divider]

    Today’s WTA matches. Scores added as known.

    (3) A Radwanska (POL) d (5) S Errani (ITA) — 7-6(1), 7-5
    (4) N Li (CHN) d D Cibulkova (SVK) — 7-6(1), 6-2
    S Cirstea (ROU) d (6) P Kvitova (CZE) — 4-6, 7-5, 6-2
    (1) S Williams (USA) d M Rybarikova (SVK) — 6-1, 6-1

    [divider]

    Click here to discuss the Men’s results with fellow tennis fans in our discussion forum.

    Click here to discuss the Women’s results with fellow tennis fans in our discussion forum.